On 10/30/13 7:02 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
as i already replied, i don't see how that can be done when some trees hold int values and some hold string values.
Then use different tables (or views) per table.
i don't want so complicated solution. mtrees table is designed to hold many trees because it has tname column. with mtree parameter it is possible to define the type of each table. what is wrong with that?
The wrong part here is that your patch breaks loading mtree-like tables. If you want to combine mtrees-like tables with definition in config, that's fine, do proper patch for it. Don't break what was designed from the start of the module. Daniel