6 dec 2012 kl. 16:23 skrev Peter Dunkley <peter.dunkley(a)crocodile-rcs.com>om>:
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 16:06 +0100, Olle E. Johansson
wrote:
The flow token points to a flow saying that Kamailio should NOT parse the Contact URI and
find a destination. It should find the proper connection.
In the specific case of a single server (no edge proxies) the flow token will
indicate exactly what the source of the REGISTER was (assuming the example algorithm from
section 5.2 of RFC 5626 is used) - which may have no connection because it could have
arrived over UDP. Assuming that any binding within the NAT in-front of the client is
still live this allows us to route back to client without any of the contact
aliasing/received stuff. In actual fact, the information in the flow token should allow
both $du to be correctly set and force_send_socket() to be called correctly.
Example Algorithm: When the proxy boots, it selects a 20-octet
crypto random key called K that only the edge proxy knows. A byte
array, called S, is formed that contains the following information
about the flow the request was received on: an enumeration
indicating the protocol, the local IP address and port, the remote
IP address and port. The HMAC of S is computed using the key K
and the HMAC-SHA1-80 algorithm, as defined in [RFC2104]. The
concatenation of the HMAC and S are base64 encoded, as defined in
[RFC4648], and used as the flow identifier. When using IPv4
addresses, this will result in a 32-octet identifier.
However, this strikes me as something that does need to be handled within C code when
setting the destination because as sophisticated as Kamailio configuration can be,
performing base64 decoding followed by HMAC-SHA1-80 followed by complex string parsing may
be a bit too much <face-smile.png>
Right. I should have used "flow" instead of connection, as outbound support
connectionless flows :-)
I agree that that algorithm may not be simple to implement in the routing language...
/O