Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
I haven't studied exactly the algorithm, but from
what I understood, the
contacts have to be sorted also by reg-id. What is not clear yet for me
is if Q values still plays a role.
i was wondering that too. what is the relationship between q and reg-id?
First, it will require to propagate sip-instance and
reg-id fields to
destination set (via branch_t structure) from usrloc/registrar -- just
adding some fields and copy the values as we do for example for path
and q.
what if sip-instance is missing, but reg-id is present like in this
register request from barasip?
REGISTER sip:test.fi SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.98.102.10:5050;branch=z9hG4bKe8fc3b4174d10554;rport.
Contact:
<sip:0x8bac4f0@192.98.102.10:5050;transport=tcp>;expires=600;q=0.8;reg-id=1.
Max-Forwards: 70.
Route: <sip:192.98.102.10;transport=tcp;lr>.
To: <sip:test@test.fi>.
From: <sip:test@test.fi>;tag=a41662ae8ebfb044.
Call-ID: 72e7f927a4be41a2.
CSeq: 33968 REGISTER.
User-Agent: baresip v0.4.2 (i586/linux).
Supported: outbound, path.
Content-Length: 0.
or is it a bug in baresip?
-- juha