Oh, I also tried with 5.2.0-dev1 nightly and it also crashes in the same
way...
On 30 November 2017 at 01:07, George Diamantopoulos <georgediam(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I've been trying to get a core dump on this for
hours now, but I just
can't get one! Is there anything special needed with this build on debian
stretch? Checked ulimits, disable_core_dump, /etc/default/kamailio, started
it as root (-u root -g root), from systemd with user kamailio, with working
directory set in command line and in config file, I just can't get a core
dump...
Thanks
On 29 November 2017 at 18:10, George Diamantopoulos <georgediam(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
I've just installed kamailio 5.1 nightly from the debian repo for
stretch. I didn't change anything in the configuration compared to 5.0.4
(which I was testing previously), apart from the database structure as
found in the wiki for upgrading from 5.0.x.
Now kamailio crashes after a while, with the following output in the logs:
Nov 29 15:47:05 modcom-sbc-dev1 kamailio[2497]: 3(2502) ERROR: <core>
[core/udp_server.c:481]: udp_rcv_loop(): print buffer building failed
Nov 29 15:47:05 modcom-sbc-dev1 kamailio[2497]: 121(2620) CRITICAL:
<core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 26
Nov 29 15:47:05 modcom-sbc-dev1 kamailio[2497]: 121(2620) DEBUG: <core>
[core/tcp_main.c:3512]: handle_ser_child(): dead child 3, pid 2502
(shutting down?)
Nov 29 15:47:05 modcom-sbc-dev1 kamailio[2497]: 121(2620) DEBUG: <core>
[core/io_wait.h:602]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x55ae7132ffc0,
26, -1, 0x0) fd_no=126 called
Nov 29 15:47:05 modcom-sbc-dev1 kamailio[2497]: 0(2499) ALERT: <core>
[main.c:741]: handle_sigs(): child process 2502 exited normally, status=255
Nov 29 15:47:05 modcom-sbc-dev1 kamailio[2497]: 0(2499) INFO: <core>
[main.c:771]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to SIGCHLD
Nov 29 15:47:05 modcom-sbc-dev1 kamailio[2497]: 0(2499) DEBUG: <core>
[main.c:773]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to SIGCHLD
Nov 29 15:47:05 modcom-sbc-dev1 kamailio[2497]: 118(2617) INFO: <core>
[main.c:826]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
Let me know if I can somehow help dissect this issue, I don't really know
where to start. Thanks.
BR,
George