On 5/30/11 9:50 AM, Alex Hermann wrote:
On Saturday 28 May 2011 18:42:07 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
rtpproxy: close rtpproxy session for INVITE req in failure route
- update of rtpproxy_manage() to close rtp relay session when executed in failure route
Maybe i misunderstood the concept of this new function, but how is this patch compatible with the scenario in which the first branch does not need rtpproxy, so rtpproxy_manage() is not called, but the second branch launched from failure_route does. I suppose that with this patch, you can't use rtpproxy_manage() from failure_route anymore to enable the rtpproxy?
in failure_route you enable a branch_route execution and there you call rtpproxy_maange() -- this is the way of avoiding conflict decision with failure_route for the cases when it is a new relay or not.
Cheers, Daniel