30 Nov
2024
30 Nov
'24
9:48 a.m.
I think the code is better how it is because the second parameter of the function you gave as example in the issue has to be a valid string. In the current form, it indicates there is a problem with the parameter, rather than having it silently not doing anything when it was expected to be a change of the value. As commented in the issue, use sr-users mailing list if you want to discuss further.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4044#issuecomment-2508904860
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: kamailio/kamailio/pull/4044/c2508904860@github.com