15 Apr
2010
15 Apr
'10
7:22 p.m.
2010/4/15 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>at>:
Am 15.04.2010 01:30, schrieb Iñaki Baz Castillo:
> Does the added debugging information conform to the grammar of the Warning header?
> Examples:
>
> Warning: 307 isi.edu "Session parameter 'foo' not
understood"
> Warning: 301 isi.edu "Incompatible network address type
'E.164'"
Almost, e.g:
Warning: 392 213.192.59.75:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=3882
req_src_ip=83.136.33.3 req_src_port=43356 in_uri=sip:iptel.org
out_uri=sip:iptel.org via_cnt==1"
Code 392 is not defined by IANA
(http://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters), IMO changing it to 399
would be more standard conform.
As a conclusion, I second turning it off by default, but naming it "Warning"
is OK as it is a standardized header for such purposes.
And replace 392 with 399. I fully agree.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>