27 May
2010
27 May
'10
11:20 a.m.
On May 27, 2010 at 09:29, Miklos Tirpak <miklos(a)iptel.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 05/26/2010 11:46 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Yes, one can t_reply() the transaction from the on_reply route. Note though
that this will act as the final reply (the transaction will be
terminated, no failure route will be called) and not as a per branch
reply.
If you want to change the per-branch reply, you need to use Miklos's
new addition with the limitation that you can't change the reply class.
Andrei
2010/5/26 Miklos Tirpak <miklos(a)iptel.org>rg>:
Exotic question: what would occur if I change a 180 response to 486 in
onreply_route? Transaction client must end in this case, would it
happen?
to keep the feature simple, I disallowed this case. 1xx can be
changed only to 1xx, 2xx to 2xx, and [3456]xx to [3456]xx.
As far as I know Andrei added support for sending replies from
onreply_route. You can call t_reply(486, "...") when the 180 is
received if you wish, I think tm will cancel the pending branch
properly. Hence, I did not care about this case, and just disallowed
it. How can
the reply status be changed?
there should be some other function added, what tm
module does is only
checking for the change. If you need it then I can add the function to
modules_s/textops for instance.