24 Jun
2009
24 Jun
'09
4:15 p.m.
On 06/24/2009 09:39 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Juha Heinanen writes:
...
coming from same direction and for me is not acceptable that strong
personal opinions/interests drive decisions regarding the core framework
and public project without proper discussion.
I and probably others have completely different names when deploying the
application in particular cases, but that is something I keep it inside
my company as patches or cloned repository. Sure would be easy if I
would change it on the public project so the others will do it, not me,
but we are a group of people that invest a lot of their private
resources, so we should act democratically.
Now happened with the name, but in the future one can think of something
else, turning in a chaotic evolution, so we rather (and better) have it
clear from this point of time, otherwise makes no sense to continue.
Daniel
fine, make it "undecided".
i would like to add that i'm coming from kamailio project and using
binary name "ser" in sip-router project is not acceptable to me. there
was never a decision on that. it just happened. "sip-router" is a
neutral choice until the community votes on the final name.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/