20 Dec
2012
20 Dec
'12
11:35 a.m.
20 dec 2012 kl. 17:20 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
On 12/20/12 5:16 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
Well, I changed the issue then - I'm curious on the difference...
/O
20 dec 2012 kl. 16:13 skrev Ovidiu Sas
<osas(a)voipembedded.com>om>:
It is not the case here, modules_k/ldap does not have any relation to database
interface. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
What's the difference between the db1 and db2 interface?
>> - nathelper - some extra functionality,
not sure if can be kept
>> completely
> Maybe Andreas can look into this, as there is a lot of work going on with
> nathelper and the new rtpproxy anyways.
I think Ovidiu Sas looked at it when he split the rtpproxy out in a
dedicated module.
IIRC, ping_contact whas the extra functionality in nathelper:
http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/master/modules_s/nathelper/…
I don't know how widely used is this functionality.
Maybe we should have a separate thread per module (in user mailing
list to gather more imput) and see if it's worth merging the code or
use only the k version.
Also, on a separate note, I saw the we have a few db2_[module].
I think it would make sense for these modules to rename them into
[module]_db[1|2].
For example: ldap - we should have both versions under modules:
- ldap_db1
- ldap_db2
Just a suggestion ...