4 Jun
2009
4 Jun
'09
5:57 a.m.
On Jun 04, 2009 at 12:34, Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
No, you should replace the LOG/LM_* call inside the xlog module code,
corresponding to the script xlog() command.
The script xlog() doesn't have to change, only its implementation.
Andrei
Replace the corresponding LOG line with:
LOG_(DEFAULT_FACILITY, L_INFO, "<script>: ", ...(old LOG
content)...)
andrei,
are you suggesting that if i now have xlog
xlog("L_INFO", "INFO: Routing in-dialog $rm from <$fu> to
<$ru>\n")
i should replace it with
LOG_(DEFAULT_FACILITY, L_INFO, "<script>: ", "INFO: Routing
in-dialog $rm from <$fu> to <$ru>\n" )
if yes, it is far too long and complicated.