18 Jul
2009
18 Jul
'09
5:42 p.m.
On 18.07.2009 13:24 Uhr, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Jul 18, 2009 at 13:12, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
no ntpdate, could be suspend, although
it seems to happen even without
it, but I have to watch it to be sure.
Cheers,
Daniel
I see pretty many warnings of this type:
4(22966) WARNING: <core> [timer.c:448]: WARNING: our timer runs faster
then real-time (1570000 ms / 25120 ticks our time .-> 1569937 ms / 25118
ticks real time)
4(22966) WARNING: <core> [timer.c:448]: WARNING: our timer runs faster
then real-time (1005000 ms / 16080 ticks our time .-> 1002398 ms / 16038
ticks real time)
is it something to ignore?
If you see them after suspend or ntpdate, you can ignore them
If you see them very often, there's a strange problem somewhere (I would
expect to run slower, but not faster).
Andrei
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-bootcamp/