24 Mar
2022
24 Mar
'22
12:01 a.m.
Hello Daniel,
you are only partially correct. Under German copyright law there are different
copyrights:
- a copyright on the video on itself (which probably belongs to Pascom, as you've
stated)
- a copyright on the presentation (which belongs to the person presenting)
- a copyright to the slides/other material shown (which belongs to the creator of the
slides/other material)
I do not think that Pascom can simply give these rights away.
A similar right situation would be e.g., if I visit a concert of a well-known and famous
band and record it on my smartphone. I can not simple release this to the world, as I do
not own the rights on the actual music performance. Or when I make a picture from the Mona
Lisa, I am not allowed to sell my own copies from it etc..
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Pocock <daniel(a)pocock.pro>
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 10:20 PM
To: Henning Westerholt <hw(a)gilawa.com>om>; Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
<sr-dev(a)lists.kamailio.org>rg>; Kamailio Devel List
<sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org>
Subject: Re: [sr-dev] licensing of videos and images from Kamailio World?
On 23/03/2022 21:29, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Hello Daniel,
I am not aware of any explicit copyright assignment process that were done at the last
KamailioWorld conferences, at least the ones that I participated.
So, the copyright of the individual content (videos, slides) belongs to the individual
author/presenter. For the videos there is also probably some copyright regarding the video
production (e.g. like it was done from the Pascom guys). Obviously, the individual country
rights (Germany as the location, and probably also the authors origin) should be
considered as well.
In the law, it is not the presenter, the author is the person taking a photo or making a
video:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photograph_copyright_(Germany)
In this case, it sounds like Pascom owns the copyright
Presenters would retain rights in their materials, e.g. slides and photos used inside
their slides
The videos are therefore a derivative work, derived from any materials used by the
presenter.
In most cases the authors did not explicitly choose a
licence for their content, so there is no well-known licence like creative commons under
which this content is available.
In a perfect world, all the presenters, video camera operators and people who worked on
editing (Pascom) would sign a disclaimer accepting CC BY-SA or whatever.
For many purposes it would probably be sufficient for Pascom to provide a statement to
accept CC BY-SA 4.0 retrospectively, if they like that idea. They could send an email
here and link to it from the web page.
Fair use rights should apply in line with the
individual country rights, but I am of course not a lawyer.
If you want to (re-)use or reproduce this content in a commercial setting you probably
should contact the individual authors/presenter.
Actually, I think the bigger thing is for Pascom to give that authorization.
Regards,
Daniel
--
https://danielpocock.com