1 Aug
2011
1 Aug
'11
1:31 p.m.
On Friday 29 July 2011, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Hi Iñaki,
i saw that you just commited it. Does the new function does implement the same
functionality as the one in nathelper?
Best regards,
Henning
Indeed there
is kind of "conflict of interests" here. Maybe the ipops can
get a slightly different implementation, where the match can be, based on
parameters, restricted to a network address match. I thought would be
useful in non-nat-travesal cases, where nathelper is not loaded.
I've already implemented it in ipops module. The function (not
commited yet) is called "ip_is_rfc1918()" not to conflict with
"is_rfc1918()" function in nathelper module (I'd really would like
*namespaces* for separating module functions!) :)
Is it ok if I commit it?