Hi Andrei!
Do you think this is also relevant for sip-router's TCP implementation?
regards klaus
-------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: [Kamailio-Users] TCP supervisor process in Kamailio Datum: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:00:49 +0200 Von: Pascal Maugeri pascal.maugeri@gmail.com An: Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com CC: kamailio users@lists.kamailio.org Referenzen: 990aed650907070551k594ee26cl3056fa7090742e1b@mail.gmail.com 4A53466F.1070102@gmail.com
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierlamiconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On 07/07/2009 02:51 PM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Hi
I recently read the following in order to optimize OpenSER in handling TCP connections:
"First, the TCP supervisor process must be given an elevated priority level in order to prevent anomalous behavior due to the Linux scheduler."
First of all, as this is quite old paper
where is this paper?
http://www.cs.rice.edu/CS/Architecture/docs/ram-ispass08.pdf (Section 4.3, page 6). -pascal
Thanks, Daniel
(it refers to OpenSER 1.2), I'm wondering if such a tuning is still needed for Kamailio 1.5 branch ? If yes, how can I do this ?
Regards, Pascal
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com/
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users