3 Jul
2009
3 Jul
'09
1:04 p.m.
On 07/03/2009 06:38 PM, Jan Janak wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
probably the script writer that loads the pv module is aware of what it
exports and does: $name is looked up first as PV then as avp.
If the ser writer would use avp class prefix all the time e.g.: $f.name
for avps in from list instead of just $name, then it is really no
possible overlapping.
That will remove the possible typo errors with PV, in K if $name does
not exist (let's say I wrote $fx instead of $fd), then error is issued
at startup. Now is considered to be avp and possible to appear at runtime.
If $class.name is enforced in ser side, then we can get good startup
checking and no namespace overlapping.
Daniel
On 07/03/2009 06:15 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
The thing that started this is "$fd". If you see "$fd" written in
the
sip-router configuration file, how can you tell whether this is an AVP
or a PV? The answer is you cannot, unless you look into the
implementation.
in order to clear lots of confusion
whose confusion? pv framework is pretty different that select, things like
$sht(htable=>key) a.s.o. do not reflect something in the sip message.
This is a burning issue in many modules. It is not a
problem as long
as you only use kamailio modules or only ser modules, but it become
apparent when we try to mix them.
Jan.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/