Re: [sr-dev] [SR-Users] Single-quoted vs double-quoted params in Path/Route

Now while doing some interop tests with another platform, it turned out that double-quotes are not allowed in URI params (see https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/sip-implementors/2008-May/019335.ht…, and in the grammar the allowed chars in the "unreserved" definition are "alphanum" and "mark", where "mark" is only "-" / "_" / "." / "!" / "~" / "*" / "'" / "(" / ")" ). Anyways, to fully comply with RFC3261, I'd like to push a bugfix to path module to use single-quotes instead, however it also needs a change in the parser to use parse_quoted_param() also in case of single-quoted params (which hasn't been handled at all until now).

My question now is if there are any concerns on your side with handling single-quoted URI params the way we handle double-quoted ones? If we were strict, we'd actually need to remove the handling for double-quoted ones, but for backwards-compatibility I'd rather keep it there.