Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] pv: adding xavp_copy (#2070)

I found the code `reply_received` in tm synchronizing the execution of `onreply_route`. I think we should merge this first small iteration and I can proceed with another MR to add another xavp_copy function taking 4 params after, in order to proceed with small iterations, let me know if you think otherwise. I already have the code for `xavc_copy("source_name", "source_index", "destination_name", "destination_index")` This will let the user copy to a specific posistion in the stack (replacing its value). This would bring coherent behaviour compared to assign to a specific index vs appendind. Example : swapping xavp in and existing stack: (second and third elements) ``` $xavp(a=>x) = "a-0-x"; $xavp(a[0]=>y) = "a-0-y"; $xavp(a=>x) = "a-1-x"; $xavp(a[0]=>y) = "a-1-y"; $xavp(a=>x) = "a-2-x"; $xavp(a[0]=>y) = "a-2-y"; # INFO: <script>: NEW $xavp(a[0]) = [a-2-x][a-2-y] # INFO: <script>: NEW $xavp(a[1]) = [a-1-x][a-1-y] # INFO: <script>: NEW $xavp(a[2]) = [a-0-x][a-0-y] xavp_copy("a", "1", "c"); xavp_copy("a", "2", "a", "1"); xavp_copy("c", "0", "a", "2"); # INFO: <script>: AFTER $xavp(a[0]) = [a-2-x][a-2-y] # INFO: <script>: AFTER $xavp(a[1]) = [a-0-x][a-0-y] # INFO: <script>: AFTER $xavp(a[2]) = [a-1-x][a-1-y] ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2070#issuecomment-536997210