Re: [sr-dev] alias_contact()/handle_alias() ready for testing

Juha Heinanen schrieb:

Klaus Darilion writes:

...

I think the "reply" problem needs to be solved using the registrar NAT bflag. If NAT flag is set for callee, activate a reply-route with add_alias() (can be done per branch).

that is not correct, because add_alias() needs to be called even when reply comes from a tcp ua that is not behind nat.

ok. depends in your NAT-traversal approach. In my pragmatic approach I do NAT traversal anyway for all local users, thus it would work for me.

If you have a more advanced NAT traversal approach, probably you need a second bflag which will is activated either by NAT or TCP.

regards klaus