26 Nov
2010
26 Nov
'10
8:50 a.m.
2010/11/26 Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com>om>:
It's not a bug in the grammar. The BNF grammar is not the only source
of specification. For example, RFC 3261 BNF states that Contact header
can contain a "*" chat as value, but the "Registration" section
defines that it can only be used for deŕegistering all the contacts.
Isn't it enough?:
Section 20:
The Contact, From, and To header fields contain a URI. If the URI
contains a comma, question mark or semicolon, the URI MUST be
enclosed in angle brackets (< and >). Any URI parameters are
contained within these brackets. If the URI is not enclosed in angle
brackets, any semicolon-delimited parameters are header-parameters,
not URI parameters.
Juha, I ensured it to you because I spent long time with it some time
ago, but in a first try I couldn't find the RFC 3261 section in which
this is defined. Now you already have it.
Regards.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
This is a
complex grammar in the RFC 3261, and there have been long
discussions about it in sip-implementors maillist, you can search for
them if you want.
i don't want, but it is really strange that there is such a bug in the
grammar that has not been fixed by some other rfc. Yes, of
course, but then it CANNOT contain URI params, just header
params.
that is just your opinion that so far you have not based on any fact in
rfc3261.