22 Mar
2013
22 Mar
'13
4:21 p.m.
Hi Daniel
understood. We haven't developed anything yet, I wanted to know the
general opinion about the convenience of writing a module of such nature
in kamailiio. By the way, it that person is "listening", it would be
nice if we can get in touch.
Regards
Javi
On 03/22/2013 03:53 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Someone else approached me at Fosdem (iirc), saying
they are working
on (or already have) a module to deal with SIP-I, but it may not
actually happen to get it from there (unless the person is here and
can confirm more).
Anyhow, adding in a new module is ok as long as there is a maintainer
for it in the first year. Most of my modules were added because I
needed them, not because there was another potential user. In this
case, as said above, I expect more to use it, but that does not matter
at the end. So I would find it useful to have.
Just for sake of completeness, besides the maintainer rule, the only
constraint for modules would be not to be something very specific just
for a private use case (e.g., a connector to an internal system, not
available to others at all, with custom protocol and no chance for
additional use cases). Not the case here, of course, being actually
about a recognized standard.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 3/22/13 3:27 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Yes, but what happens when those modifications,
or responses based on
those modifications, are returned to the sender? Much as with most
SIP headers, the sending SS7 gateway can well say, "I didn't send that."
Javi Gallart <jgallart(a)systemonenoc.com> wrote:
> Thanks Alex
>
> the first thing that came to my mind is performing some number
> manipulation. Imagine kamailio acting as a router for several carriers.
>
> One of them demands an international NOA with a weird prefix, whereas
> the other one, for the same destination, requires a pound (#) at the
> end, and so on. I agree with you in disliking idea of being too
> "invasive" in the body of the sip message, but it's something already
> doable for instance with SDP.
>
> Javi
> On 03/22/2013 02:50 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> Hi Javi,
>>
>> The first question to ask is: if Kamailio could understand ISUP
>> parameters, what would it do with them?
>>
>> If the answer is "not a whole lot", chances are it is something that
>> only needs to be understood by the endpoints, and which Kamailio
> would
>> continue to be agnostic to, as it is now. Kamailio is, above all
>> else, a message relay.
>>
>> -- Alex
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev