8 Dec
2009
8 Dec
'09
5:59 a.m.
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
i didn't quite get this. in sr_3.0, i do see avps in onrely_route that
were set in route block before t_relay was called. is this what andrei
means in above by default behavior? if so that is fine with me.
Yes. So sr has a different default behavior than k. (should be
documented in migration guide)
regards
klaus
K's
tm module can be configured to have transaction AVPs or message AVPs:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.5.x/tm#id2530480
What is the behaviour of ser's tm module? I need AVPs in reply route -
is it supported?
In theory, yes by default. In practice it looks like there's a bug if
several replies are processed in the same time.
As a quick fix for sr_3.0 I might introduce the same mechanism as in k.