17 Jul
2014
17 Jul
'14
4:21 p.m.
On 07/17/2014 04:06 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 07/17/2014 03:53 PM, Fred Posner wrote:
I do want to write a module to make Kamailio RFC 2324 compliant, but am
waiting for the proper hardware.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2324/?include_text=1
--fred
The question is very difficult to answer, for the
reasons Alex
explained....
The core of Kamailio is an RFC3261 SIP Server.
Adding or using different modules will to the list of RFCs... such as
with CPL module (RFC3880), invoking P-asserted-identity (RFC3325), using
DNS NAPTR (RFC2915), Websockets (RFC6455), etc.
I assume that what's actually going on here is that someone's
boss/management/client/stakeholder made the arbitrary requirement,
however nonsensical it is to us engineers, to list the RFCs supported
and compare them that way.
In that case, a political solution is required, not a technically
accurate one. And the political solution is to list as many pertinent
RFCs as possible. This is useful:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5411/?include_text=1
I encourage you to look at the title of that RFC and ponder why it
exists, and consider my answer in that light. It wasn't meant to be
hostile or standoffish. It's just the reality.
-- Alex