3 Dec
2010
3 Dec
'10
12:10 p.m.
Hello,
On 12/3/10 10:53 AM, Bernhard Suttner wrote:
Hi,
some more informations I got during testing:
1. if I dont set l_uuid and set reg_contact_addr to "ip-addr" then I get a
Contact like: "@ip-addr".
2. if I dont set l_uuid and set reg_contact_addr to "user@ip-addr" then I get a
Contact like "user@ip-addr"
3. if I set l_uuid and set reg_contact_addr to "ip-addr" then I get a Contact
like "l_uuid@ip-addr".
4. if I set l_uuid and set reg_contact_addr to "user@ip-addr" then I get a
Contact like "l_uuid@user@ip-addr"
reg_contact_addr has to be only
hostname part.
l_uuid is used as username when building the full contact address.
I just committed a fix to check for empty values and return error if it
is not. the module does not work if l_uuid is empty, since it is the
internal key.
Cheers,
Daniel
Thanks!
Best regards,
Bernhard
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Dezember 2010 10:35
An: Bernhard Suttner
Cc: sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
Betreff: Re: [sr-dev] UAC Issue
Hello,
On 12/3/10 10:24 AM, Bernhard Suttner wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Kamailio (OpenSER) Advanced Training
Jan 24-26, 2011, Irvine, CA, USA
http://www.asipto.com
Hi,
I am using UAC to register to an outbound provider. Kamailio (3.1.0) does send the
following REGISTER:
E..'A...@.=...P...P9......\1REGISTER sip:172.16.0.57 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.0.130;branch=z9hG4bKa69c.50411006.0
To: sip:SIP001@172.16.0.57
From: sip:SIP001@172.16.0.57;tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-c10d
CSeq: 10 REGISTER
Call-ID: 7bad8cfd-13535(a)127.0.0.1
Content-Length: 0
User-Agent: kamailio (3.1.0 (i386/linux))
Contact:<sip:@172.16.0.130>
Expires: 600
Authorization: Digest username="SIP001", realm="asterisk",
nonce="1be9f4f2", uri="sip:172.16.0.57",
response="e46d865eb495e170fdef058b857d7b76", algorithm=MD5
I am not really 100% sure, but I think the Contact address is not valid. Within the
database I have only set the host part. I think the Contact should be the following then:
Contact:<sip:172.16.0.130)
(without the @).
this is wrong, indeed. The username in database was somehow
supposed not
to be empty, because should be the ID of a local user. I will fix it.
In addition, I think the Call-ID could be better.
I know, that it is valid to set it like that, but the IP Address 127.0.0.1 could be
misunderstood somewhere.
It shouldn't be at all misunderstood, Call-ID must be just a unique
token, with no meaning to routing or something else.
Thanks,
Daniel