Re: [sr-dev] Crash bug

I have two core dumps from the last few days with the same crash, and I took a look at the call flows for both Call-IDs. Both seem to play out the same way as the crash I sent you: Mar 19 13:22:57 Proxy1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21580]: INFO: [R-OUTBOUND-VENDOR-ROUTE-TRY:e5e48a99-48dd-1233-96b7-782bcb13da6a] -> Final request URI: sip:yyy@xxx:5060 Mar 19 13:22:57 Proxy1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21580]: INFO: [R-INVITE-OUTBOUND-HANDLER-POSTROUTE:e5e48a99-48dd-1233-96b7-782bcb13da6a] -> Request processing delay: 27 ms Mar 19 13:22:57 Proxy1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21580]: INFO: [R-OUTBOUND-VENDOR-ROUTE-TRY-BRANCH:e5e48a99-48dd- 1233-96b7-782bcb13da6a] Sending media through rtpproxy Mar 19 13:22:57 Proxy1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21572]: INFO: [R-MAIN:e5e48a99-48dd-1233-96b7-782bcb13da6a] CANCEL received from xxx (RURI=sip:yyy@xxx:5060) Mar 19 13:22:58 Proxy1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21569]: INFO: [R-MAIN:e5e48a99-48dd-1233-96b7-782bcb13da6a] CANCEL received from xxx (RURI=sip:yyy@xxx:5060) Mar 19 13:23:00 Proxy1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21566]: INFO: [R-MAIN:e5e48a99-48dd-1233-96b7-782bcb13da6a] CANCEL received from xxx (RURI=sip:yyy@xxx:5060) They also have another common characteristic: The normal call flow is to relay the INVITE on branch .0 to an LNP gateway, then to capture the LRN from a redirect and relay the INVITE to its actual destination via branch .1. In all cases, however, there was a Redis cache hit on the LRN that did not require branch .0. -- Alex