5 May
2010
5 May
'10
1:32 p.m.
Are PV mathematical expressions evaluated in lexical argument scope of
routines that accept a route name?
In other words, maybe it's a problem because
route($(avp(s:port)+1));
or something like that may also have some meaning?
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
1170 Peachtree Street
12th Floor, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
On May 5, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
i tried to define route
route [+358] { ... }
but got syntax error. is there a good reason why + is not allowed in
name of route?
-- juha
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev