2 Jul
2010
2 Jul
'10
10:43 p.m.
My guess is that it would be easy. The differences are
mainly in
exported callbacks and some missing or extra script functions.
k version has the *challenge() functions (which were removed from ser,
but could be re-added easily) and some pv stuff.
andrei,
i tried to add k compatible www_challenge/proxy_challenge functions to
modules_s/auth and it is not easy (at least for me). i created function
static inline int build_hf(struct sip_msg* msg, int stale, str* realm,
str* nonce, str* algorithm, int hftype, str* hf)
that just builds the hf str and then using it, it is easy to implement
current build_challenge_hf function:
int build_challenge_hf(struct sip_msg* msg, int stale, str* realm, str* nonce,
str* algorithm, int hftype)
{
str hf;
avp_value_t val;
if (build_hf(msg, stale, realm, nonce, algorithm, hftype, &hf)) {
val.s = hf;
if (add_avp(challenge_avpid.flags | AVP_VAL_STR, challenge_avpid.name,
val) < 0) {
ERR("auth: Error while creating attribute\n");
pkg_free(hf.s);
return -1;
}
pkg_free(hf.s);
return 0;
} else {
return -1;
}
}
but when i tried to implement k *_challenge functions using it, i was
not able to figure out how to create nonce parameter. also, qop is
module param in s auth.
-- juha