sr-dev December 2024

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

17 participants
345 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] Module snmpstats reporting inconsistent call success metrics on intense peaks of failed calls (Issue #4006)
by igorpotjevlesh 28 Feb '25

28 Feb '25

### Description We are plotting the call success rate on each of our proxies. Using the Kamailio snmpstats module, we try to obtain three counters in order to plot them on a graph: - Total Calls - Active Calls - Error Calls Most of the time, everything works well and we obtain sensible values: `snmpwalk -c mycommunity -v 2c W.X.Y.Z 1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2 -O n` > .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.1.0 = Gauge32: 309 -> Total Calls .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.2.0 = Gauge32: 95 -> Active Calls .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.3.0 = Gauge32: 214 -> Error calls However, **when our proxies are facing intense peaks of failed calls in a short timespan**, sometimes, the **"Error Calls"** counter returns a value **higher than "Total Calls"**. As a result, **"Active Calls"** suddenly reaches a value close to the **maximum of a _Gauge32_** (because ${TotalCalls} - {ErrorCalls} < 0$). `snmpwalk -c mycommunity -v 2c W.X.Y.Z 1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2 -O n` > .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.1.0 = Gauge32: 153 -> Total Calls .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.2.0 = Gauge32: 4294967226 -> Active Calls .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.3.0 = Gauge32: 223 -> Error calls As a result, our graphs make no more sense. ### Troubleshooting There seems to be a bug causing Total calls to be lower than Error calls when a high number of failed calls are received in a short time window. Moreover, there is an integer overflow resulting to the negative result of the substraction being converted to a _Gauge32_. Maybe setting it to 0 in case of a negative result would be safer ? #### Reproduction Using the following configuration for the snmpstats module of your Kamailio proxy: ``` # -------- snmpstats params ------- modparam("snmpstats", "snmpgetPath", "/usr/bin/") modparam("snmpstats", "snmpCommunity", "mycommunity") modparam("snmpstats", "sipEntityType", "proxyServer") ``` On intense peaks of failed calls, get the call success metrics using `snmpwalk` : `snmpwalk -c mycommunity -v 2c W.X.Y.Z 1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2 -O n` > .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.1.0 = Gauge32: 153 -> Total Calls .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.2.0 = Gauge32: 4294967226 -> Active Calls .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.3.0 = Gauge32: 223-> Error calls ### Additional Information **Kamailio Version**: `kamailio -v` > version: kamailio 5.6.4 (x86_64/linux) a004cf flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_ MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_S R_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, U SE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SI ZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 64MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: a004cf compiled on 16:10:41 May 22 2023 with gcc 4.4.7 * **Operating System**: `uname -r` > 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64 `lsb_release -a` > LSB Version: :core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-amd64:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-amd64:printing-4.0-noarch Distributor ID: RedHatEnterpriseServer Description: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.3 (Santiago) Release: 6.3 Codename: Santiago -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4006 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4006(a)github.com>

2 5

[kamailio/kamailio] Handling Duplicate Values in secfilter Module's kamcmd Commands (Issue #4091)
by AsedMorteza 27 Feb '25

27 Feb '25

**Description** The `secfilter` module in `kamcmd` currently allows duplicate entries when adding values to certain lists (e.g., blacklists, whitelists). This can lead to unexpected behavior and potential inconsistencies. Could you clarify the reason behind accepting duplicate values? Recently, I submitted a pull request to add delete commands to the `secfilter` module #4089. When a user, for example, executes: `kamcmd secfilter.del_bl user 1005` I iterate through the entire list to ensure all occurrences of `1005` are removed, as I realized duplicates might exist. This is inefficient and could be avoided by preventing duplicates in the first place. **Proposed Solutions** 1. **Prevent Duplicates in Existing `add` Commands:** * I can modify existing `add` commands to directly prevent the addition of duplicate values. This would simplify future operations and improve performance. 2. **Introduce New `add_unique` Commands:** * I can maintain the current `add` commands for backward compatibility. * I can introduce new `add_unique` commands (e.g., `secfilter.add_bl_unique`) that explicitly reject duplicate entries. **Recommendation** I recommend implementing the first solution (preventing duplicates in existing `add` commands) as it provides the most straightforward and efficient approach. **Further Considerations** * Consider adding a check for duplicates during the `add` operation and returning an appropriate error message if a duplicate is encountered. * Document the behavior of duplicate values in the `secfilter` module's documentation. **I would appreciate your feedback and guidance on the best course of action.** -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4091 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4091(a)github.com>

3 2

[kamailio/kamailio] Wrong Route header order in called party re-INVITE when using topos (Issue #3778)
by Javi Montoro 24 Feb '25

24 Feb '25

Hi There, We found a situation where topos seems to break, let me explain... Assuming the following scenario: ``` Caller ---- Callee A: ------INVITE-----> Record-Route:A.A.A.A, Record-Route:B.B.B.B B: <-----200 OK------ C: <-----INVITE------ Route: A.A.A.A, B.B.B.B D: ------200 OK-----> Record-Route:B.B.B.B, Record-Route:A.A.A.A (reversed order) E: <======INVITE===== Route: B.B.B.B, A.A.A.A (wrong) ``` A and B establish the connection from caller to callee, and topos works fine. C (re-INVITE from callee) sends the Route header according to the Record-Routes from the original INVITE (A) D is the 200 OK sent from the caller to the first re-INVITE (C) coming from the callee, with the Record-Route headers reversed, because is the order in which the callee received them; and according to the RFC it's working as intended: ``` When a UAS responds to a request with a response that establishes a dialog (such as a 2xx to INVITE), the UAS MUST copy all Record-Route header field values from the request into the response (including the URIs, URI parameters, and any Record-Route header field parameters, whether they are known or unknown to the UAS) and MUST maintain the order of those values. [...] [When a UAC receives a response...] The route set MUST be set to the list of URIs in the Record-Route header field from the response, taken in reverse order and preserving all URI parameters. ``` E takes the Route order from the last 200 OK ignoring they are in reversed order and assuming the top one is the first one, when it should be the other way around, sending to an IP address not reachable from the callee. And I think here is the issue, topos should not update the path on the Record-Routes from a 200 OK but if it does, it should take the reverse order When disabling topos, everything works fine, or with topos enabled, by setting rr_update=0 works for us, but what if there is a real path update, rr_update=0 wouldn't work for us anymore. The Kamailio version is 5.8.0-rc0 Let me know if you need more information. Thanks a lot, Javi -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3778 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3778(a)github.com>

5 16

[kamailio/kamailio] secfilter‌: support remove rule in Whitelist and Blacklist (PR #4089)
by AsedMorteza 22 Feb '25

22 Feb '25

#### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [x] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description ##### **Summary** This update introduces new functionality to the `secfilter` module, enabling the removal of entries from both the Blacklist and Whitelist. It also includes automatic detection and removal of duplicate values from these lists. ##### **Details** * Users can now remove specific entries from the Blacklist or Whitelist based on type (e.g., IP, domain, user) and a given value. * Supports removal of single or multiple matching entries in one operation. ##### **Benefits** - Improves the usability and flexibility of the `secfilter` module by allowing fine-grained control over list management. - Ensures that the Blacklist and Whitelist are kept clean and free from redundant entries. - Enhances performance by reducing unnecessary duplication in the lists. ##### Testing This feature was tested using `kmcmd` commands in various scenarios: - Removing the **first element** in the list. - Removing an element from the **middle** of the list. - Removing the **last element** in the list. - Removing **all matching elements** in the list. In all cases, the commands worked correctly, and the lists were updated and cleaned as expected. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4089 -- Commit Summary -- * secfilter‌: support remove rule in Whitelist and Blacklist -- File Changes -- M src/modules/secfilter/secfilter.c (8) M src/modules/secfilter/secfilter.h (3) M src/modules/secfilter/secfilter_db.c (106) M src/modules/secfilter/secfilter_rpc.c (95) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4089.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4089.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4089 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/4089(a)github.com>

3 5

[kamailio/kamailio] topos:added get_callid_mask/get_callid_unmask funtion for handeling Refer-To header (PR #3872)
by Harish S 22 Feb '25

22 Feb '25

Topos: Added get_callid_mask functin which will give the masked callID if actual callID is given and get_callid_unmask function which will unmask the given call-ID. This funtion is useful when the client sends a refer methord with refer-to header containing call-id  #### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [x] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description  You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3872 -- Commit Summary -- * add funtion to mask/unmask callID * get_callid_mask /get_callid_unmask Document Update -- File Changes -- M src/modules/topos/doc/topos_admin.xml (87) M src/modules/topos/topos_mod.c (183) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3872.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3872.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3872 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3872(a)github.com>

4 11

[kamailio/kamailio] topos: add enable_register_publish (PR #3766)
by Harish S 22 Feb '25

22 Feb '25

Added enable_register_publish parameter to enable REGISTER and PUBLISH method for topos If set to 1 REGISTER and PUBLISH will be enabled for topos Currently only via header will be applied for topos and if mask_callid is set to 1 call-ID will be masked. Other headers should be manged by the user as required.   #### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [ ] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description  You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766 -- Commit Summary -- * add enable_register_publish -- File Changes -- M src/modules/topos/topos_mod.c (2) M src/modules/topos/tps_msg.c (132) M src/modules/topos/tps_msg.h (2) M src/modules/topos/tps_storage.c (6) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766(a)github.com>

5 38

[kamailio/kamailio] fr_timer documentation mistake (Issue #3939)
by Dmitry Sinina 21 Feb '25

21 Feb '25

Documentation https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tm.html#tm.p.fr_timer says: >Timer which hits if no **final reply** for a request or ACK for a negative INVITE reply arrives (in milliseconds). Looks like it is not correct description - fr_timer value works until 1xx(not **final**) response received and then timer restarted with fr_inv_timer value there: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/modules/tm/t_reply.c#L… Looks like old doc from sip router https://sip-router.org/wiki/ref_manual/timers explains it correctly: > fr_timer This timer is used for all SIP requests. It hits if no reply for an INVITE request or other request has been received (F in milliseconds). If a provisional reply is received for an INVITE (any 1xx), then the fr_inv_timer will be used instead. And if no replies (at all) for an INVITE are received before `fr_timer` hits, the transaction is terminated with a 408 in failure route. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3939 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3939(a)github.com>

3 7

[kamailio/kamailio] cmake: switching deb rules (Issue #4053)
by Victor Seva 19 Feb '25

19 Feb '25

Opening this generic issue to track issues when trying to switch deb package generation to cmake: -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4053 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4053(a)github.com>

4 52

[kamailio/kamailio] dispatcher module usage on kamailio 5.8.4 generate kamailio crash (Issue #4061)
by pgravet 19 Feb '25

19 Feb '25

### Description kamailio crash with signal 6 ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction After each couple of dispatcher ping interval. #### Debugging Data No core dump file. #### Log Messages Dec 6 17:47:24 frnappcoe3router2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1618]: INFO: ctl [io_listener.c:211]: io_listen_loop(): using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected) Dec 6 17:47:34 frnappcoe3router2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1614]: NOTICE: <script>: tm:local-request called OPTIONS to <sip:frnappcoe3sfl05.orange-voicemail.net:5060> Dec 6 17:47:34 frnappcoe3router2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1614]: NOTICE: <script>: tm:local-request called OPTIONS to <sip:cs1-tool-misc.orange-voicemail.net:5060> Dec 6 17:47:44 frnappcoe3router2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1614]: NOTICE: <script>: tm:local-request called OPTIONS to <sip:frnappcoe3sfl05.orange-voicemail.net:5060> Dec 6 17:47:44 frnappcoe3router2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1614]: NOTICE: <script>: tm:local-request called OPTIONS to <sip:cs1-tool-misc.orange-voicemail.net:5060> Dec 6 17:47:44 frnappcoe3router2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1608]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:555]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f178fa8a700), called from core: core/xavp.c: xavp_free(81), first free core: core/xavp.c: xavp_new_value(117) - ignoring Dec 6 17:47:44 frnappcoe3router2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1608]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:136]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: fragm. 0x7f178fa8a560 (address 0x7f178fa8a5a0) end overwritten (0, f00000000000)! Memory allocator was called from core: core/xavp.c:81. Fragment marked by (null):2882400237. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:546. Dec 6 17:47:44 frnappcoe3router2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1604]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:805]: handle_sigs(): child process 1608 exited by a signal 6 Dec 6 17:47:44 frnappcoe3router2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1604]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:809]: handle_sigs(): core was not generated Dec 6 17:47:44 frnappcoe3router2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1604]: INFO: <core> [main.c:832]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to SIGCHLD #### SIP Traffic ### Possible Solutions ### Additional Information [root@frnappcoe3router2 ~]# kamailio -v version: kamailio 5.8.4 (x86_64/linux) f1d83d flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: f1d83d compiled on 13:59:57 Nov 12 2024 with gcc 8.5.0 kamailio.cfg loadmodule "dispatcher.so" modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", DISPATCHER_FILE) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_threshold",3) modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:siprouter@unisys.com") modparam("dispatcher", "xavp_dst", "_dsdst_") modparam("dispatcher", "xavp_ctx", "_dsctx_") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 8) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 10) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes", "class=2;class=3") * **Operating System**: RHEL8.8 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4061 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4061(a)github.com>

5 10

[kamailio/kamailio] In function ksr_tm_event_response_sent(evname), header and body modifications are not applied (Issue #3997)
by JuanPascual2 19 Feb '25

19 Feb '25

Hello In the function ksr_tm_event_response_sent(evname), header and body modifications are not applied. **Example of modification:** KSR.textops.set_body("application/test", "teststbody") KSR.textops.remove_hf("Contact") KSR.hdr.append("X-My-Hdr: testhdrappend \r\n") In the Kamailio logs, we can see that the changes have been processed, but the response sent does not contain the changes. BR Juan **Configuration kamailio.cfg** modparam("tm", "event_callback_lres_sent", "ksr_tm_event_response_sent") **Configuration kamailio.lua** ----------------------- --Function ksr_tm_event_response_sent bug ----------------------- function ksr_tm_event_response_sent(evname) log.debug("\27[36m --> Sending reply: $rs $rr \27[0m") log.debug("\27[35m Reply sent ",evname,"\27[0m") KSR.textops.set_body("application/test", "teststbody") KSR.textops.remove_hf("Contact") KSR.hdr.append("X-My-Hdr: testhdrappend \r\n") end **Traces debug KAMAILIO** 4(260) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1023]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[0] for: xinfo is str: 2024-10-10 10-18-10 [debug] /opt/kamailio/kamailio.lua:96: --> Sending reply: $rs $rr 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/pvapi.c:502]: pv_spec_lookup(): PV <$rs> is not in cache 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/pvapi.c:386]: pv_cache_add(): pvar [$rs] added in cache 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/pvapi.c:502]: pv_spec_lookup(): PV <$rr> is not in cache 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/pvapi.c:386]: pv_cache_add(): pvar [$rr] added in cache 4(260) INFO: <script>: 2024-10-10 10-18-10 [debug] /opt/kamailio/kamailio.lua:96: --> Sending reply: 200 OK 4(260) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1023]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[0] for: xinfo is str: 2024-10-10 10-18-10 [debug] /opt/kamailio/kamailio.lua:97: Reply sent tm:local-response-sent 4(260) INFO: <script>: 2024-10-10 10-18-10 [debug] /opt/kamailio/kamailio.lua:97: Reply sent tm:local-response-sent 4(260) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1023]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[0] for: set_body is str: application/test 4(260) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1023]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[1] for: set_body is str: teststbody 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_hname2.c:315]: parse_sip_header_name(): parsed header name [To] type 3 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:185]: parse_to_param(): add param: tag=bb3c24ed793eec883784ff522b4e48d0 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:904]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=29 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:172]: get_hdr_field(): <To> [61]; uri=[sip:1234@sip.osp.com] 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:174]: get_hdr_field(): to body (22)[<sip:1234@sip.osp.com>], to tag (32)[bb3c24ed793eec883784ff522b4e48d0] 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_hname2.c:315]: parse_sip_header_name(): parsed header name [From] type 4 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_hname2.c:315]: parse_sip_header_name(): parsed header name [CSeq] type 5 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:152]: get_hdr_field(): cseq <CSeq>: <63723> <REGISTER> 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_hname2.c:315]: parse_sip_header_name(): parsed header name [Call-ID] type 6 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_hname2.c:315]: parse_sip_header_name(): parsed header name [Content-Type] type 11 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_hname2.c:315]: parse_sip_header_name(): parsed header name [Contact] type 7 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_hname2.c:315]: parse_sip_header_name(): parsed header name [Content-Length] type 12 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:187]: get_hdr_field(): content_length=6 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:91]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header 4(260) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:2597]: ki_set_body(): new body: [application/test] 4(260) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1023]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[0] for: remove_hf is str: Contact 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_hname2.c:315]: parse_sip_header_name(): parsed header name [Contact] type 7 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/kemi.c:2350]: sr_kemi_hdr_remove(): remove hf: Contact 4(260) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1023]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[0] for: append is str: X-My-Hdr: testhdrappend 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/kemi.c:2224]: sr_kemi_hdr_append(): append hf: X-My-Hdr: testhdrappend 4(260) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_mod.c:166]: sr_kemi_config_engine_lua(): execution of route type 513 with name [ksr_tm_event_response_sent] returned 1 4(260) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:634]: _reply_light(): reply sent out - buf=0x786b611bb9e0: SIP/2.0 200 OK Via:... shmem=0x786b58ceea80: SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: 4(260) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:133]: put_on_wait(): put T [0x786b58ceb770] on wait 4(260) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:650]: _reply_light(): finished 4(260) DEBUG: jsonrpcs [jsonrpcs_mod.c:443]: jsonrpc_send_mode(): sending response with body: (nil) - 200 OK 4(260) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1023]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[0] for: xinfo is str: 2024-10-10 10-18-10 [debug] /opt/kamailio/kamailio.lua:36: ksr_request_route: 23.11 ms 4(260) INFO: <script>: 2024-10-10 10-18-10 [debug] /opt/kamailio/kamailio.lua:36: ksr_request_route: 23.11 ms 4(260) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_mod.c:169]: sr_kemi_config_engine_lua(): execution of route type 1 with no name returned 1 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:531]: receive_msg(): request-route executed in: 23343 usec 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/usr_avp.c:654]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil) 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/usr_avp.c:654]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil) 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/usr_avp.c:654]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil) 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/usr_avp.c:654]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil) 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/usr_avp.c:654]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil) 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/usr_avp.c:654]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil) 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/xavp.c:630]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil) 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/xavp.c:630]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil) 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/xavp.c:630]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil) 4(260) DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:635]: receive_msg(): cleaning up 18(274) DEBUG: tm [timer.c:642]: wait_handler(): finished transaction: 0x786b58ce81a0 (p:0x786b58baa3c0/n:0x786b58baa3c0) 18(274) DEBUG: tm [h_table.c:133]: free_cell_helper(): freeing transaction 0x786b58ce81a0 from timer.c:651 18(274) DEBUG: tm [timer.c:642]: wait_handler(): finished transaction: 0x786b58ceb770 (p:0x786b58b729c0/n:0x786b58b729c0) 18(274) DEBUG: tm [h_table.c:133]: free_cell_helper(): freeing transaction 0x786b58ceb770 from timer.c:651 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3997 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3997(a)github.com>

4 7

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev December 2024