sr-dev March 2017

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

31 participants
269 discussions

[kamailio] feature request: sample config for federation / peering with repro (#531)
by Daniel Pocock 27 Sep '18

27 Sep '18

repro servers peer with each other in a federated manner just like SMTP servers for email, but using TLS mutual authentication to prevent impersonation. Kamailio has TLS support and should be able to talk to such servers and other Kamailio servers in the same way. It would be good to create a recommended sample configuration for this type of service and also add it to the RTC Quick Start Guide: http://rtcquickstart.org/guide/multi/sip-proxy.html --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/531

3 8

[kamailio] support usrloc handle_lost_tcp variable also in DB-Only scheme (#171)
by juha-h 04 Sep '18

04 Sep '18

--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/171

2 3

[kamailio/kamailio] auth_db Deprecate email_address in database schemas (#858)
by Olle E. Johansson 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

I suggest we delete the "email_address" field in database schemas for auth_db. I think it was put there as an example of extendability but a lot of users seems confused about this and Kamailio by default does not use that field at all. Any opinions? If we reach an agreement we'll produce patches and clean up the various schemas. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/858

3 8

[kamailio] add GnuTLS support (#371)
by zabbal 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

OpenSSL is well known for huge amount of deadly security vulnerabilities, even before heartbleed. It would be nice if I could avoid bringing in such a library just because of Kamailio - having support for GnuTLS will let the user to make such a choice. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/371

4 6

[kamailio] set_contact_alias is not applied (#445)
by Olle E. Johansson 20 Jun '18

20 Jun '18

If I run set_contact_alias nothing happens - the contact remains the same on the outbound message There's no error returned and debug logs indicate a proper header However, if I add "msg_apply_changes()" on the line after set_contact_alias the Contact sent to next hop has the alias content No other changes --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/445

3 19

[kamailio] error while dumping dialog via RPC (#145)
by Savolainen Dmitri 01 May '18

01 May '18

In part of profiles and/or variables section while using `static inline void internal_rpc_print_dlg(rpc_t *rpc, void *c, dlg_cell_t *dlg, int with_context) ` May be it is an error of ctl module ``` # kamcmd dlg.list { h_entry: 6718 h_id: 20440 call-id: 48c9fe85f6750163(a)192.168.5.60 from_uri: sip:000*051@xxxxxx.xx:5068 to_uri: sip:002@xxxxxx.xx:5068 state: 4 start_ts: 1430324850 init_ts: 1430324847 timeout: 1430368049 lifetime: 43200 dflags: 515 sflags: 0 iflags: 0 caller: { tag: bda5e24faa4c4ff5 contact: sip:000*051@192.168.5.60:5066;transport=udp;alias=xxx.xxx.78.202~5066~1 cseq: 5457 route_set: socket: udp:xxx.xxx.66.150:5068 } callee: { tag: 4y2gjr7N9231K contact: sip:002@xxx.xxx.66.151:5080;transport=udp cseq: 0 route_set: socket: udp:xxx.xxx.66.150:5068 } profiles: { ERROR while parsing the record 62, @698: 03 : bad record ``` --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/145

4 6

[kamailio/kamailio] db_cassandra can't find table version (#618)
by goharahmed 03 Mar '18

03 Mar '18

Hi devs, I'm trying to make the db_cassandra work for my kamailio specifically userblacklist module. I've cassanda keyspace and tables defined along with the db_schema directory structure defined as instructed however the debug logs keep telling me that table 'version' doesn't exist. I've taken a look inside the dbcassa_table.c file https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/modules/db_cassandra/dbcas… Somewhere in this function it just doesn't get hold of "tbc" and hence it throws up error. Here is how I've figured out this code. hash = core_hash(dbn, tbn, DBCASSA_TABLE_SIZE); **if(!hash) LM_ERR("hash NOT FOUND\n");** hashidx = hash % DBCASSA_TABLE_SIZE; **if(!hashidx) LM_ERR("hashidx NOT FOUND\n");** ref_read_data(dbcassa_tbl_htable[hashidx].lock); tbc = dbcassa_tbl_htable[hashidx].dtp; **if(!tbc) LM_ERR("TBC NOT FOUND\n");** while(tbc) { LM_DBG("found dbname=%.*s, table=%.*s\n", tbc->dbname.len, tbc->dbname.s, tbc->name.len, tbc->name.s); if(tbc->hash==hash && tbc->dbname.len == dbn->len && tbc->name.len == tbn->len && !strncasecmp(tbc->dbname.s, dbn->s, dbn->len) && !strncasecmp(tbc->name.s, tbn->s, tbn->len)) { memcpy(full_path_buf + dbcassa_schema_path.len, dbn->s, dbn->len); len = dbcassa_schema_path.len + dbn->len; full_path_buf[len++] = '/'; memcpy(full_path_buf + len, tbn->s, tbn->len); full_path_buf[len + tbn->len] = '\0'; if(dbcassa_check_mtime(&tbc->mt) == 0) return tbc; old_tbc = tbc; break; } tbc = tbc->next; } unref_read_data(dbcassa_tbl_htable[hashidx].lock); **if(!old_tbc) { LM_ERR("OLD_TBC NOT FOUND\n");** return NULL; } and upon starting of kamailio after recompiling the module I see these lines printed. 0(15574) DEBUG: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:149]: db_cassa_new_connection(): opening connection: cassa://xxxx:xxxx@127.0.0.1:9160/kamailio 0(15574) DEBUG: <core> [mem/f_malloc.c:439]: fm_malloc(): fm_malloc(0x7f9c14f8a010, 48) called from db_cassandra: dbcassa_base.cpp: db_cassa_new_connection(155) 0(15574) DEBUG: <core> [mem/f_malloc.c:514]: fm_malloc(): fm_malloc(0x7f9c14f8a010, 48) returns address 0x7f9c150055f0 0(15574) DEBUG: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:161]: db_cassa_new_connection(): 0x7f9c150055f0=pkg_malloc(48) 0(15574) DEBUG: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:117]: dbcassa_open(): Opened connection to Cassandra cluster 127.0.0.1:9160 0(15574) DEBUG: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:955]: db_cassa_query(): query table=version **0(15574) ERROR: db_cassandra [dbcassa_table.c:463]: dbcassa_db_get_table(): TBC NOT FOUND 0(15574) ERROR: db_cassandra [dbcassa_table.c:486]: dbcassa_db_get_table(): OLD_TBC NOT FOUND** 0(15574) ERROR: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:449]: cassa_translate_query(): table version does not exist! 0(15574) ERROR: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:962]: db_cassa_query(): Failed to query Cassandra cluster 0(15574) ERROR: <core> [db.c:397]: db_table_version(): error in db_query 0(15574) ERROR: <core> [db.c:436]: db_check_table_version(): querying version for table userblacklist 0(15574) ERROR: userblacklist [db_userblacklist.c:86]: userblacklist_db_init(): during table version check. 0(15574) DEBUG: <core> [db_pool.c:100]: pool_remove(): removing connection from the pool 0(15574) DEBUG: <core> [mem/f_malloc.c:575]: fm_free(): fm_free(0x7f9c14f8a010, 0x7f9c150055f0), called from db_cassandra: dbcassa_base.cpp: db_cassa_free_connection(203) 0(15574) DEBUG: <core> [mem/f_malloc.c:594]: fm_free(): fm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from db_cassandra: dbcassa_base.cpp: db_cassa_new_connection(155) 0(15574) DEBUG: <core> [mem/f_malloc.c:575]: fm_free(): fm_free(0x7f9c14f8a010, 0x7f9c15005318), called from core: db.c: db_do_close(356) 0(15574) DEBUG: <core> [mem/f_malloc.c:594]: fm_free(): fm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from core: db.c: db_do_init2(298) 0(15574) ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:968]: init_mod(): Error while initializing module userblacklist (/usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/userblacklist.so) ERROR: error while initializing modules Kindly look into this and let me know how to make this work. Thanks, Sammy --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/618

3 14

[kamailio/kamailio] Problem with topos together with track_cseq_updates (#1038)
by lamSteven 01 Mar '18

01 Mar '18

### Description When using the dialog track_cseq_updates feature (to increase the cseq for calls that are authenticated using the uac uac_auth) together with topos, it seems like a reply is not handled by topos. #### Log Messages I have a 2219 line debug log demonstrating this, i can supply this on request. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1038

4 15

[kamailio] [Feature request] Python3 support for app_python (#544)
by Anthony Messina 01 Mar '18

01 Mar '18

Currently, app_python old works with Python2. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/544

3 3

[kamailio] dmq_usrloc replication and max_contacts (Kamailio v4.3.1) (#265)
by 00Asgaroth00 16 Feb '18

16 Feb '18

This is a snip from the user's mailing list, I'm just adding it to the issue tracker, as it is yet to be confirmed as a bug, only here for tracking pruporses: ``` I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same AOR, I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and I use the 0x04 flag on the save function. When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node where the actual registration took place only has 1 contact for the AOR. ``` ``` It seems to me like another bug, although again I'm not familiar with the module so can't be sure without looking that it is not intended behaviour. I plan to look later this week when I have some time but in the meantime, you can send me the examples directly if you like. ``` --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/265

6 17

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
27
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev March 2017