sr-dev December 2017

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

26 participants
475 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[kamailio] support usrloc handle_lost_tcp variable also in DB-Only scheme (#171)
by juha-h 04 Sep '18

04 Sep '18

--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/171

2 3

[kamailio/kamailio] auth_db Deprecate email_address in database schemas (#858)
by Olle E. Johansson 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

I suggest we delete the "email_address" field in database schemas for auth_db. I think it was put there as an example of extendability but a lot of users seems confused about this and Kamailio by default does not use that field at all. Any opinions? If we reach an agreement we'll produce patches and clean up the various schemas. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/858

3 8

[kamailio] add GnuTLS support (#371)
by zabbal 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

OpenSSL is well known for huge amount of deadly security vulnerabilities, even before heartbleed. It would be nice if I could avoid bringing in such a library just because of Kamailio - having support for GnuTLS will let the user to make such a choice. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/371

4 6

[kamailio/kamailio] ims_isc module does not deliver to AS after asynchronous SAR to HSS (distinct PSI) (#1168)
by Christoph VALENTIN 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

### Description This is the same test case as I used for bug Report #1160 I used kamailio as an scscf (based on the configuration files from kamailio/examples/scscf) I did some changes according to my needs I did some Basic tests - the results were satisfying --> OK I configured a distinct PSI on the HSS (sip:04321234501@vict-ims.net) --> OK I registered some user from a Zoiper Client --> OK I told zoiper to call sip:04321234501@vict-ims.net --> I received 555 AS Contacting Failed - iFC terminated dialog ### Troubleshooting For some reason, the ims_isc module cannot deliver the Initial INVITE to the AS. First I thought, there was a bug in TM module, however there was no bug in TM module (please find the Explanation in issue #1160) The ims_isc module issues a CRITICAL log: File 2017_06_20_distinct_psi_03_scscf_kamailio.log: Line 642 - 660: Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: INFO: ims_registrar_scscf [cxdx_avp.c:138]: cxdx_get_avp(): cxdx_get_experimental_result_code: Failed finding avp Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: INFO: ims_registrar_scscf [cxdx_sar.c:84]: create_return_code(): created AVP successfully : [saa_return_code] - [1] Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[UNREG_SAR_REPLY] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=127 a=26 n=xlog Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[UNREG_SAR_REPLY] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=143 a=21 n=switch Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[UNREG_SAR_REPLY] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=130 a=26 n=xlog Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[UNREG_SAR_REPLY] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=131 a=5 n=route Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[term] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=673 a=26 n=xlog Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[term] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=675 a=24 n=t_newtran Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: tm [tm.c:1316]: w_t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: transaction already in process 0x7ff2a6e66a58 Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[term] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=677 a=25 n=set_dlg_profile Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[term] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=692 a=16 n=if Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[term] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=685 a=25 n=is_method Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[term] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=686 a=63 n=assign Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[term] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=687 a=63 n=assign Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[term] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=688 a=24 n=record_route Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[term] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=698 a=16 n=if Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[term] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio-scscf/kamailio-scscf-routes.cfg] l=692 a=26 n=isc_match_filter Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: INFO: ims_isc [mod.c:233]: isc_match_filter(): Checking triggers Jun 20 16:14:12 vict-ims /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[108125]: CRITICAL: ims_isc [mod.c:284]: isc_match_filter(): SKIP: 0 #### Reproduction I can help to reproduce the issue. mailto:christoph.valentin@kapsch.net Currently I have got an experimental test setup using Zoiper Clients. After week 27 I should have simulated test cases to repeat the Scenario "per mouse-click" #### Debugging Data  ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  ``` [logs-tshark-routes_2017_06_21.zip](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/fil… ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` sip || diameter traffic at the s-cscf (172.29.21.23) [logs-tshark-routes_2017_06_21.zip](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/fil… ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` [root@vict-ims ~]# kamailio -v version: kamailio 4.4.5 (x86_64/linux) b0945e-dirty flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: b0945e -dirty compiled on 20:06:13 Jun 7 2017 with gcc 4.8.5 [root@vict-ims ~]# ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` [root@vict-ims ~]# uname -a Linux vict-ims 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jan 29 18:37:38 EST 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@vict-ims ~]# ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1168 [View Less]

2 8

[kamailio] set_contact_alias is not applied (#445)
by Olle E. Johansson 20 Jun '18

20 Jun '18

If I run set_contact_alias nothing happens - the contact remains the same on the outbound message There's no error returned and debug logs indicate a proper header However, if I add "msg_apply_changes()" on the line after set_contact_alias the Contact sent to next hop has the alias content No other changes --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/445

3 19

[kamailio/kamailio] I_perform_user_authorization_request(): no int value param passed (#1099)
by riccardovarotto 04 May '18

04 May '18

5 11

[kamailio] error while dumping dialog via RPC (#145)
by Savolainen Dmitri 01 May '18

01 May '18

In part of profiles and/or variables section while using `static inline void internal_rpc_print_dlg(rpc_t *rpc, void *c, dlg_cell_t *dlg, int with_context) ` May be it is an error of ctl module ``` # kamcmd dlg.list { h_entry: 6718 h_id: 20440 call-id: 48c9fe85f6750163(a)192.168.5.60 from_uri: sip:000*051@xxxxxx.xx:5068 to_uri: sip:002@xxxxxx.xx:5068 state: 4 start_ts: 1430324850 init_ts: 1430324847 timeout: 1430368049 lifetime: 43200 dflags: 515 sflags: 0 … [View More]

4 6

[kamailio/kamailio] Feature Request: possibility to reload dialogs from db without restarting kamailio (#1274)
by alexsosic 14 Apr '18

14 Apr '18

Hi, we're trying to have scalable Kamailio nodes that are stateless. That means that we can for example load dispatchers and reload them from an API endpoint. Now we're stuck on the dialog part. All our nodes load the dialogs from a shared db, what happens when a node gets down is that a packet reaches another node and does not know how to handle that because the dialog does not have it's ip address. Also there is no possibility to reload the dialogs from db so that we could update the … [View More]

8 28

[kamailio/kamailio] define flag_t as unsigned long (#1288)
by juha-h 05 Apr '18

05 Apr '18

Currently core/flags.h defines typedef unsigned int flag_t; It would better to use unsigned long in order to allow more that 32 flags on 64 bit architectures. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1288

3 19

[kamailio/kamailio] IPOPS is_in_subnet function doesn't match host address in cidr notation (#1250)
by kbdfck 03 Apr '18

03 Apr '18

### Description is_in_subnet function requires subnet param to be network address and fails for host address in cidr notation despite it is contained in corresponding subnet. For example, is_in_subnet("1.2.3.2", "1.2.3.0/30") returns true but is_in_subnet("1.2.3.2", "1.2.3.2/30") returns false, although 1.2.3.2 is present in 1.2.3.2/30 and 1.2.3.2 is allowed IP of 1.2.3.0/30 Of course, "1.2.3.2/30" this is not actually a subnet specification and rather is IP in CIDR notation, but sometimes … [View More]

2 2

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
48
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev December 2017