[Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

On 03/30/07 12:30, Cesc wrote:
> On 3/30/07, Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt at 1und1.de> wrote:
>> On Friday 30 March 2007 01:00, Cesc wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Just throwing wild ideas ... but if we moved to autotools (we need to
>> > look for a guru ... I agree, more than autotools is auto-chaos) we
>> > could easily cross-compile ...
>> > And that said, it just comes to mind the chance of cross-compiling
>> > with mingw and have a windows openser, just for the non-linux user and
>> > expand our borders. It may be a cut down version to start with, but
>> > wouldn't it be great?
>>
>> Hi Cesc,
>>
>> i don't think that it would be so easy to port openser to windows, 
>> there are
>> many Unix/ Linux specific thinks specified deep in the code.
>>
>> More easy cross-compiling could be nice. But then we should use cmake 
>> instead
>> of autotools, like the KDE project, because this is usable even for 
>> non-gurus
>> like me. :-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Henning
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Well, never used cmake myself, so can't tell. Autotools is complicated
> if starting from scratch, but if using existing configs from some
> other project, the jumpstart is very big.
>
> As for the port ... i would expect some difficulties in some parts,
> like locking, loging and memory mgmnt ... also some database access
> libraries ... but maybe a simple, very cut-down version, with basic
> functionality, could be realized ...
database should not rise issues. For locking/memory can be used sysv. 
The module interface should be analyzed. Won't be easy, though...

Cheers,
Daniel

>
> Just brainstorming ...
>
> Cesc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>