[SR-Users] Load balance on HA scenario

[Duarte Rocha]

Hey.

I'm already using ip_free_bind, but that is not my problem.
I cannot use probing on those peers and I need to know if Dispatcher can be
able to not include those peers in the destination list since their socket
doesn't belong to the machine and include the peers in the destination list
in case the IP jumps to that machine.

Cheer

A segunda, 12/10/2020, 15:34, Duarte Rocha <duarterocha91 at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Greetings,
>
> I have two machines with Kamailio in a HA setup with replicated DB. For
> simplicity let's say each machine has one HA IP and that IP can jump to the
> other machine in case something happens (kamailio stopping, etc).
>
> I'm using Dispatcher with load balance configuration. I have Dispatcher
> configured so that each peer has one instance for socket with HA IP 1 and
> HA IP 2.
>
> In order for this to work correctly on the load balance scenario I must
> disable via RPC command the peer which has the socket that doesn't belong
> to the machine. I also must do it every time the IP jumps back and forth,
> which adds complexety to my system.
>
> Does Dispatcher has any sort of help on this? It could not include peers
> with sockets IPs that don't belong to the machine in the destination set,
> for example. Is this possible?
>
> I could also work with failover support but i would rather avoid having so
> many failovers.
>
> Best Regards,A
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20201013/5b317fb3/attachment.htm>