[SR-Users] Load balance on HA scenario
Alex Balashov
abalashov at evaristesys.com
Tue Oct 13 06:49:19 CEST 2020
How useful that Kamailio can now do this independently!
On 10/13/20 12:48 AM, Sergey Safarov wrote:
> Are you looking ip_free_bind = 1?
> https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.4.x/core
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:34 PM Duarte Rocha <duarterocha91 at gmail.com
> <mailto:duarterocha91 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I have two machines with Kamailio in a HA setup with replicated DB.
> For simplicity let's say each machine has one HA IP and that IP can
> jump to the other machine in case something happens (kamailio
> stopping, etc).
>
> I'm using Dispatcher with load balance configuration. I have
> Dispatcher configured so that each peer has one instance for socket
> with HA IP 1 and HA IP 2.
>
> In order for this to work correctly on the load balance scenario I
> must disable via RPC command the peer which has the socket that
> doesn't belong to the machine. I also must do it every time the IP
> jumps back and forth, which adds complexety to my system.
>
> Does Dispatcher has any sort of help on this? It could not include
> peers with sockets IPs that don't belong to the machine in the
> destination set, for example. Is this possible?
>
> I could also work with failover support but i would rather avoid
> having so many failovers.
>
> Best Regards,A
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
More information about the sr-users
mailing list