[SR-Users] Load balance on HA scenario

[Sergey Safarov]

Are you looking   ip_free_bind = 1?
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.4.x/core

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:34 PM Duarte Rocha <duarterocha91 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I have two machines with Kamailio in a HA setup with replicated DB. For
> simplicity let's say each machine has one HA IP and that IP can jump to the
> other machine in case something happens (kamailio stopping, etc).
>
> I'm using Dispatcher with load balance configuration. I have Dispatcher
> configured so that each peer has one instance for socket with HA IP 1 and
> HA IP 2.
>
> In order for this to work correctly on the load balance scenario I must
> disable via RPC command the peer which has the socket that doesn't belong
> to the machine. I also must do it every time the IP jumps back and forth,
> which adds complexety to my system.
>
> Does Dispatcher has any sort of help on this? It could not include peers
> with sockets IPs that don't belong to the machine in the destination set,
> for example. Is this possible?
>
> I could also work with failover support but i would rather avoid having so
> many failovers.
>
> Best Regards,A
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20201013/7366f42d/attachment.htm>