[SR-Users] Redundancy of Progress Call using Kamailio

[Julien Chavanton]

So in fact it may simply work without any replication, except that you have
to disable the failing server

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, 08:45 Julien Chavanton <jchavanton at gmail.com> wrote:

> You may wonder what kind of failure scenario you are trying to address as
> replication will probably fail as well in many cases.
>
> One technique would be to use a domain name in the Via, the transaction
> may not need to be replicated as it can be recreated by the server
> receiving the reply, thanks to SIP resilient design.
>
> However you may have to address the timers and any failover, AVP
> replication (if any).
>
> Probably other small concerns.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:40 AM Amit Pal <amit.pal at coraltele.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Team ,
>>
>>              Hope all is fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> My requirement : I have a customer who wants high availability for
>> ringing calls and calls that in process of being set up.
>>
>> Can you suggest an alternate mechanism to achieve replication of
>> transaction state. Can you guide how it can be achieved in Kamailio or is
>> there a mechanism to get commercial support
>>
>> to achieve the desired objective.
>>
>> I am waiting your response.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Amit Pal
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20200804/22a19734/attachment.htm>