[SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

[Infinicalls Infinicalls]

Hi,

I referred to the totag. Sorry if I mistook it for to field.

regards
Ganesh Kumar

On 10/14/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 14/10/16 10:25, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/13/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Can you split the IF with t_load_contacts  () || t_next_contacts () in
>>> two
>>> to see which one fails?
>> After splitting, I get this error.
>>
>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG:
>> siputils [checks.c:97]: has_totag(): no totag
>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
>> [t_lookup.c:1011]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global
>> id=1 T start=(nil)
>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
>> [t_lookup.c:466]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start
>> searching: hash=9175, isACK=0
>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
>> [t_lookup.c:424]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching
>> failed
>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
>> [t_lookup.c:648]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no
>> transaction found
>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
>> [t_lookup.c:1080]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global
>> id=2 T end=(nil)
>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG:
>> registrar [lookup.c:240]: lookup_helper(): contact for [balaji] found
>> by address
>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG:
>> <core> [parser/parse_rr.c:453]: get_path_dst_uri(): path for branch:
>> '<sip:10.1.0.4;lr>'
>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
>> [t_serial.c:455]: t_next_contacts(): no contacts in contacts_avp - we
>> are done!
>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: ERROR:
>> <script>: t_next_contacts() failed
>>
>> The other one doesn't fail. And also, as the logs say, the "to" field
>> is also empty in the SIP requests. Any idea what went wrong?
>>
> Which message says that to field is empty? Or do you refer to the to-tag?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Oct 24-26, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
>
>


-- 
---
http://www.infinicalls.com