[SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Fri Oct 14 10:43:30 CEST 2016


Hello,

the initial INVITE must be without a to-tag, so that's fine...

I will try to see the reason for the t_load_contacts().

Cheers,
Daniel


On 14/10/16 10:31, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I referred to the totag. Sorry if I mistook it for to field.
>
> regards
> Ganesh Kumar
>
> On 10/14/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> On 14/10/16 10:25, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 10/13/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Can you split the IF with t_load_contacts  () || t_next_contacts () in
>>>> two
>>>> to see which one fails?
>>> After splitting, I get this error.
>>>
>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG:
>>> siputils [checks.c:97]: has_totag(): no totag
>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
>>> [t_lookup.c:1011]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global
>>> id=1 T start=(nil)
>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
>>> [t_lookup.c:466]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start
>>> searching: hash=9175, isACK=0
>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
>>> [t_lookup.c:424]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching
>>> failed
>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
>>> [t_lookup.c:648]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no
>>> transaction found
>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
>>> [t_lookup.c:1080]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global
>>> id=2 T end=(nil)
>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG:
>>> registrar [lookup.c:240]: lookup_helper(): contact for [balaji] found
>>> by address
>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG:
>>> <core> [parser/parse_rr.c:453]: get_path_dst_uri(): path for branch:
>>> '<sip:10.1.0.4;lr>'
>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
>>> [t_serial.c:455]: t_next_contacts(): no contacts in contacts_avp - we
>>> are done!
>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: ERROR:
>>> <script>: t_next_contacts() failed
>>>
>>> The other one doesn't fail. And also, as the logs say, the "to" field
>>> is also empty in the SIP requests. Any idea what went wrong?
>>>
>> Which message says that to field is empty? Or do you refer to the to-tag?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Oct 24-26, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
>>
>>
>

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Oct 24-26, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com




More information about the sr-users mailing list