[SR-Users] 420 Bad Extension error

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Fri Oct 14 10:28:59 CEST 2016


Hello,


On 14/10/16 10:25, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/13/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can you split the IF with t_load_contacts  () || t_next_contacts () in two
>> to see which one fails?
> After splitting, I get this error.
>
> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG:
> siputils [checks.c:97]: has_totag(): no totag
> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
> [t_lookup.c:1011]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global
> id=1 T start=(nil)
> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
> [t_lookup.c:466]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start
> searching: hash=9175, isACK=0
> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
> [t_lookup.c:424]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching
> failed
> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
> [t_lookup.c:648]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no
> transaction found
> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
> [t_lookup.c:1080]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global
> id=2 T end=(nil)
> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG:
> registrar [lookup.c:240]: lookup_helper(): contact for [balaji] found
> by address
> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG:
> <core> [parser/parse_rr.c:453]: get_path_dst_uri(): path for branch:
> '<sip:10.1.0.4;lr>'
> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm
> [t_serial.c:455]: t_next_contacts(): no contacts in contacts_avp - we
> are done!
> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: ERROR:
> <script>: t_next_contacts() failed
>
> The other one doesn't fail. And also, as the logs say, the "to" field
> is also empty in the SIP requests. Any idea what went wrong?
>
Which message says that to field is empty? Or do you refer to the to-tag?

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Oct 24-26, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com




More information about the sr-users mailing list