[SR-Users] change the to_tag on send_reply() or sl_send_reply()

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 01/03/16 17:23, Uri Shacked wrote:
> >/On 01 Mar 2016, at 16:29, Uri Shacked <ushacked at gmail.com
> <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>> wrote: />//>/Hi, />//>/Is i possible to control the to_tag when i send my own stateless reply
> from kamailio. /
> Why would you want to do that? Curious.
>
> I did however lack the capability of accessing the Kamailioi defined to-tag in the scripts. Maybe we should make
> it available in a pseudovariable somewhere.
>
> /O
>
> I have a need (unfortunately :-)) to suspend the 200ok answer that i s
> being relayed to the caller.
> I am using t_suspend() and t_continue() for it.
> But, when the caller decide to cancel the call before I managed to
> resume the transaction, I would like to send a 487 stateless in order
> for the client to disconnect immediately.
>
> So, I need to send the 487 with the relevant to_tag.
It should work to send the 487 with any To-tag, because the call is not
answered yet and the proxy can do parallel/serial forking, where there
are various tags anyhow and only one is picked up in normal case.

Have you tried to just send the 487 reply with send_reply()? Wasn't working?

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, March 7-9, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160302/2b371736/attachment.html>