[SR-Users] change the to_tag on send_reply() or sl_send_reply()

[Uri Shacked]

*I tried sl_send_reply(), send_reply() and t_reply() (after
t_newtran() for the last one).*

*all did not work.*

*if i send reply before the cancel arrives, yes, no problem.*

*but i want to reply to the cancel with 487, and it does not seem to work.*

*the only differences between my reply and the 487 destination's
reply, is the to_tag and the Cseq method (Cseq number is the same).*

*the destination's 487 to_tag is similar to the 180/183 to_tag that it
sent prior to canceling and the 487 Cseq method is for the INVITE.*

*on the reply i generate th Cseq method is CANCEL.*

*any ideas?*

*thanks,*

*Uri*





>It should work to send the 487 with any To-tag, because the call is not
>answered yet and the proxy can do parallel/serial forking, where there
>are various tags anyhow and only one is picked up in normal case.
>
>Have you tried to just send the 487 reply with send_reply()? Wasn't working?
>
>Cheers,
>Daniel


Why would you want to do that? Curious.
>
> I did however lack the capability of accessing the Kamailioi defined to-tag in the scripts. Maybe we should make
> it available in a pseudovariable somewhere.
>
> /O
>
>
> I have a need (unfortunately :-)) to suspend the 200ok answer that i s
> being relayed to the caller.
> I am using t_suspend() and t_continue() for it.
> But, when the caller decide to cancel the call before I managed to resume
> the transaction, I would like to send a 487 stateless in order for the
> client to disconnect immediately.
>
> So, I need to send the 487 with the relevant to_tag.
>
> Uri
>
> .
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Uri Shacked <ushacked at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is i possible to control the to_tag when i send my own stateless reply
>> from kamailio.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Uri
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160302/9105115a/attachment.html>