[SR-Users] seturi analog for Kamailio 4.3

[Yuriy Gorlichenko]

request_route

2015-03-16 15:43 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:

>  Is this used in request_route or in failure_route or other routing block?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
>
> If I use
>
> $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
>
>  if (!t_relay()) {
>  sl_reply_error();
> }
>
>  I see
>
> t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding
> Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]:
> sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server
> error occurred (6/SL)
>
>   if I use append_branch()
> for single client - thats is ok but 2 invites going to client.
> So client may pickup call and it successfully established.
>
> 2015-03-16 13:24 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>
>>  Hello,
>>
>> instead of seturi use:
>>
>> $ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:});
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
>>
>>  Now. when I use
>>
>> seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})");
>>
>> I see error at my log
>>
>>  ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
>>  ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
>>  ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
>>  ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
>>  ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
>> used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
>>  ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
>> used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
>>
>> As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on branch() route
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my server using
>>> append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint - kamailio
>>> generate 2 INVITE requests to it.
>>> As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch.
>>> I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination, but I
>>> can not see this function at kamailio 4.3.
>>> Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless mode. I
>>> need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing listsr-users at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
>> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing listsr-users at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20150316/a4534f14/attachment.html>