[SR-Users] seturi analog for Kamailio 4.3

[Yuriy Gorlichenko]

I mean that algorithm of creating new headers of creating INVOTE message is
the same for branch_branch route and single client. Only one difference i
that I use $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:} vs append_branch("sip:$tU@
$(du{s.select,1,:})")

This is full algo of my reqest
the first is I check at location table num of endpoints for this peer and
then at the "while" do this

                                                sql_pvquery("ca", "select
received from location where
contact='$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])'","$var(recieved)");
$du=$var(recieved);
xlog("L_INFO","SQL query return recieved {$var(recieved)} for {$tU}.
Destination is {$du}\n");
# if only one client used it means that I use $ru
if ($dbr(ra=>rows)==1)
{
 xlog("L_INFO","Single ANGENT");
 xlog("L_INFO","WS Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n");
 rtpengine_manage("force trust-address replace-origin
replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF");
 t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS");
 $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
 route("FINAL_RELAY");
}
else
{
append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})","0.7");
}

#after while ended if more that one endpoint used

t_on_branch("1");
return;

branch_route[1]{

if($du=~"transport=ws"){
xlog("L_INFO","Websocket Branch is {$du} for {$tU}\n");
rtpengine_manage("force trust-address replace-origin
replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF");
t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS");
 }
else{
xlog("L_INFO","UDP Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n");
rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove
RTP/AVP");
t_on_reply("MANAGE_CLASSIC_REPLY");
}
}

route[FINAL_RELAY]
{

if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
return;
}



2015-03-16 15:46 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook at gmail.com>:

> request_route
>
> 2015-03-16 15:43 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>
>>  Is this used in request_route or in failure_route or other routing
>> block?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
>>
>> If I use
>>
>> $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
>>
>>  if (!t_relay()) {
>>  sl_reply_error();
>> }
>>
>>  I see
>>
>> t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding
>> Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]:
>> sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server
>> error occurred (6/SL)
>>
>>   if I use append_branch()
>> for single client - thats is ok but 2 invites going to client.
>> So client may pickup call and it successfully established.
>>
>> 2015-03-16 13:24 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>>
>>>  Hello,
>>>
>>> instead of seturi use:
>>>
>>> $ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:});
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
>>>
>>>  Now. when I use
>>>
>>> seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})");
>>>
>>> I see error at my log
>>>
>>>  ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
>>>  ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
>>>  ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
>>>  ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
>>>  ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
>>> used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
>>>  ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
>>> used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
>>>
>>> As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on branch() route
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my server using
>>>> append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint - kamailio
>>>> generate 2 INVITE requests to it.
>>>> As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch.
>>>> I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination, but
>>>> I can not see this function at kamailio 4.3.
>>>> Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless mode. I
>>>> need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing listsr-users at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
>>> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing listsr-users at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
>> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20150316/afa046ad/attachment.html>