[SR-Users] seturi analog for Kamailio 4.3

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Is this used in request_route or in failure_route or other routing block?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
> If I use
>
> $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
>
> if (!t_relay()) {
> sl_reply_error();
> }
>
> I see 
>
> t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding
> Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]:
> sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry,
> server error occurred (6/SL)
>
>  if I use append_branch()
> for single client - thats is ok but 2 invites going to client.
> So client may pickup call and it successfully established.  
>
> 2015-03-16 13:24 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com
> <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     instead of seturi use:
>
>     $ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:});
>
>     Cheers,
>     Daniel
>
>
>     On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
>>     Now. when I use 
>>
>>     seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})");
>>
>>     I see error at my log
>>
>>      ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
>>      ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran:
>>     new_t failed
>>      ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
>>      ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran:
>>     new_t failed
>>      ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR:
>>     sl_reply_error used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the
>>     URI (479/SL)
>>      ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR:
>>     sl_reply_error used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the
>>     URI (479/SL)
>>
>>     As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on branch() route
>>
>>
>>
>>     2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:ovoshlook at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>         Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my server using
>>         append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one
>>         endpoint - kamailio generate 2 INVITE requests to it.
>>         As I understand it is original request and the next one is
>>         branch. 
>>         I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to
>>         destination, but I can not see this function at kamailio 4.3.
>>         Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless
>>         mode. I need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>     sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>>     http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>     -- 
>     Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>     http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>     Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
>     Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>     list
>     sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>     http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20150316/39d33274/attachment.html>