[SR-Users] RTPProxy issue?

Igor Potjevlesch igor.potjevlesch at gmail.com
Thu Mar 5 11:33:47 CET 2015


Hello,

 

Thank you.

 

Just to let you know, the RTPProxy is running in bridging mode.

Regards,

 

Igor.

 

De : sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org] De la part de
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Envoyé : jeudi 5 mars 2015 09:33
À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy issue?

 

Hello,

maybe Maxim (cc-ed) will be able to provide more insights.

Cheers,
DAniel

On 04/03/15 16:59, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:

Hello,

 

I discovered an issue related to the handling of "timestamp" and/or "Marker
bit" with rtpproxy (I use the latest Extension 20081224).

 

The call-flow is the following: one UA places a call to A and put this call
on hold. Then, the same UA call another number B. Individual streams are ok.

When the UA tries to transfer A with B, the RTPProxy receive a RTP packet
with a huge timestamp and the Marker bit set to "True".

 

Just after this RTP packet, RTPProxy stop forward the RTP packets from A to
B. B to C is still working.

 

Anyone have an idea?

Regards,

 

Igor.






_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org> 
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users





-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20150305/7fa763fd/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list