[SR-Users] RTPProxy issue?
Igor Potjevlesch
igor.potjevlesch at gmail.com
Thu Mar 5 11:33:47 CET 2015
Hello,
Thank you.
Just to let you know, the RTPProxy is running in bridging mode.
Regards,
Igor.
De : sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org] De la part de
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Envoyé : jeudi 5 mars 2015 09:33
À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy issue?
Hello,
maybe Maxim (cc-ed) will be able to provide more insights.
Cheers,
DAniel
On 04/03/15 16:59, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
Hello,
I discovered an issue related to the handling of "timestamp" and/or "Marker
bit" with rtpproxy (I use the latest Extension 20081224).
The call-flow is the following: one UA places a call to A and put this call
on hold. Then, the same UA call another number B. Individual streams are ok.
When the UA tries to transfer A with B, the RTPProxy receive a RTP packet
with a huge timestamp and the Marker bit set to "True".
Just after this RTP packet, RTPProxy stop forward the RTP packets from A to
B. B to C is still working.
Anyone have an idea?
Regards,
Igor.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20150305/7fa763fd/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list