[SR-Users] RTPProxy issue?

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

maybe Maxim (cc-ed) will be able to provide more insights.

Cheers,
DAniel

On 04/03/15 16:59, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>  
>
> I discovered an issue related to the handling of "timestamp" and/or
> "Marker bit" with rtpproxy (I use the latest Extension 20081224).
>
>  
>
> The call-flow is the following: one UA places a call to A and put this
> call on hold. Then, the same UA call another number B. Individual
> streams are ok.
>
> When the UA tries to transfer A with B, the RTPProxy receive a RTP
> packet with a huge timestamp and the Marker bit set to "True".
>
>  
>
> Just after this RTP packet, RTPProxy stop forward the RTP packets from
> A to B. B to C is still working.
>
>  
>
> Anyone have an idea?
>
> Regards,
>
>  
>
> Igor.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20150305/a141e763/attachment.html>