[SR-Users] REGISTRAR location replication (pua_reginfo)
lejarreta.e at sarenet.es
lejarreta.e at sarenet.es
Mon Nov 3 12:50:02 CET 2014
Good morning.
We've got a problem with location memory and database replication
between "n" kamailios as REGISTRAR servers.
1.- WHAT WE WANNA DO:
- To have "n" Kamailios with their DB and memory "user location"
replicated.
- Each Kamailio owns its own DB.(It could be also with a common DB).
- Each kamailio has a PUA_REGINFO, PRESENCE, and REGISTRAR roles.
- USRLOC Module with db_mode = 2 (Write-Back scheme).
2.- WHAT WE DON'T WANNA DO:
- USRLOC Module with db_mode != 2 (Write-Back scheme).
3.- BACKGROUND:
- RFC3265
- RFC3680
- RFC3903
- I attach a small architecture graph.
4.- PROBLEMS:
4.1 Deadlock:
Each REGISTER involves a NOTIFY to the other side.
Each NOTIFY involves another NOTIFY to the other side.
There should be a mechanism to avoid PUBLISH reginfo_handle_notify()
function calls but to PUBLISH save() calls on pua_reginfo module.
Any idea would be appreciated (also to workaround our problem).
4.2 PUA_REGINFO module notify.c
Just FYI.
We think It doesn't comply to RFC3680. It should observe "unkown-param"
object to aid "Contact" header params such as "Path", "Received",
"User_agent" and so on.
We've changed code but for a fast startup we've also avoided
"unkown-param" and now we're able to see replicated "Path", "Received
... params on each DB.
Thanks and best regards.
Eduardo Lejarreta.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WP_20141103_001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 228549 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20141103/3bf0e65e/attachment.jpg>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list