[SR-Users] Replacing an ACME Packet Net-Net SBC

Melanie Pietersen melanie.pietersen.ml at gmail.com
Thu Feb 27 07:24:48 CET 2014


looking at this, is there some howto for setting up high-availability,
LCR and route-by-route transcoding?

Melanie

On 2/20/14 7:12 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
>
> i would recommend, you look at the SEMS-project and it's SBC module.
>>From the functionality perspective, i don't think you'll miss anything
> compared to Acme Packet, latest trunk version even has a Registration
> cache, which works absolutely great...
>
> Kind regards,
> Carsten
>
> 2014-02-20 17:04 GMT+01:00 Francesco Maria Magnini <fmm1982 at gmail.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to have some suggestions about a full replacement of an ACME Packet Net-Net Session Border Controller.
>> By now, ACME SBC performs all the SBC functionalities, mainly:
>>
>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for SIP client registrations
>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for interconnection to multiple SIP carriers via SIP trunks
>> - it is used for NAT traversal
>>
>> In this deployment, the SIP Server communicates only with the SBC and this one takes care of the communication between the SIP Server and the external SIP entities (UA clients, SIP Trunks).
>> In this scenario, can I consider to replace the SBC with Kamailio?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
>



More information about the sr-users mailing list