[SR-Users] ACC issue on 4.0 trunk when doing serial fork
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Wed Dec 18 09:19:29 CET 2013
Hello,
I will look over it -- I wanted to know exactly the situation.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17/12/13 15:54, Kelvin Chua wrote:
>
> Yes, a local timeout. The call was sent to a bogus IP. i still feel
> this behaviour is wrong. $rd in acc should contain the failed
> gateway's ip and not the previous one.
>
> On Dec 17, 2013 4:43 PM, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda at gmail.com
> <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> It is a local timeout, not a 408 received from callee, right?
>
> Daniel
>
> On 17/12/13 05:16, Kelvin Chua wrote:
>> it's for a 408 timeout logged into missed_calls
>>
>> Kelvin Chua
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> is it for a 200ok reply or >=300?
>>
>> In the code, the r-uri from the branch that is used for
>> relaying the reply should be used.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 14/12/13 12:15, Kelvin Chua wrote:
>>> this is the 2nd branch, the first branch is sent to
>>> 100.200.30.40
>>> $rd is set properly according to xlog (10.20.30.40). tcpdump
>>> proves packets are sent to 10.20.30.40
>>> however, after failing, ACC logs dst_domain as the previous
>>> branch's $rd (100.200.30.40), not the current one.
>>> is this the expected behavior? seems incorrect.
>>>
>>> modparam("acc",
>>> "db_extra","src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;src_ip=$si;dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd;callrate=$avp(callrate)")
>>>
>>> failure_route[SERIAL] {
>>> if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) {
>>> t_on_branch("MANAGE_BRANCH");
>>> t_on_reply("MANAGE_REPLY");
>>> }
>>> if ( isbflagset(FLB_CANCEL) ) {
>>> xlog("cancel bflag set!\n");
>>> exit;
>>> } else if ( !t_next_contacts() ) {
>>> xlog("serial fork done!\n");
>>> t_reply("404", "Not here or busy");
>>> exit;
>>> } else {
>>> setflag(FLT_ACC);
>>> setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED);
>>> xlog("failure_route new branch - $ru\n");
>>> t_on_failure("SERIAL");
>>> $avp(callrate) = "";
>>> if ( $sel(ruri.params["rtmr"]) != $null ) {
>>> t_set_fr($sel(ruri.params["rtmr"])*1000,$sel(ruri.params["dtmr"])*1000);
>>> $avp(ABSOLUTE) = $sel(ruri.params["tmr"]);
>>> }
>>> if ( $sel(ruri.params["callrate"]) != $null )
>>> $avp(callrate) = $sel(ruri.params["callrate"]);
>>> xlog("failure_route sending INVITE to $rd\n");
>>> t_relay();
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> ERROR: <script>: failure_route sending INVITE to 10.20.30.40
>>> DEBUG: <script>: new branch [1] to
>>> sip:14X88X72X2X at 10.20.30.40:5060;dtmr=1;rtmr=20;tmr=60;callrate=0.007600000000
>>> DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: has_totag(): no totag
>>> DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy_funcs.c:148]:
>>> check_content_type(): type <application/sdp> found valid
>>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c:565]:
>>> extract_mediaip(): located IP address [192.168.5.191] in
>>> `o=' field
>>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c:565]:
>>> extract_mediaip(): located IP address [192.168.5.191] in
>>> `c=' field
>>> DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy.c:2630]: force_rtp_proxy(): proxy
>>> reply: 10370 2X8.1X1.3X.2X#012
>>> DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: has_totag(): no totag
>>> DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:461]: clen_builder():
>>> clen_builder: content-length: 172 (172)
>>> DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:206]: check_via_address():
>>> check_via_address(1X5.2X2.1X7.1X0, 192.168.5.191, 0)
>>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:793]: free_sdp(): _sdp =
>>> 0x7f53c9a5e580
>>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:795]: free_sdp(): sdp =
>>> 0x7f53cb87d3e0
>>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:797]: free_sdp(): session =
>>> 0x7f53cb87d480
>>> DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1710]: relay_reply(): DEBUG:
>>> relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=-1
>>> DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1211]: t_should_relay_response():
>>> ->>>>>>>>> T_code=100, new_code=408
>>> DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: run_trans_callbacks_internal():
>>> DBG: trans=0x7f53c1511148, callback type 128, id 0 entered
>>> DEBUG: acc [acc_logic.c:539]: tmcb_func(): acc callback
>>> called for t(0x7f53c1511148) event type 128, reply code 408
>>> NOTICE: acc [acc.c:279]: acc_log_request(): ACC: call
>>> missed:
>>> timestamp=1387019197;method=INVITE;from_tag=wyudf;to_tag=;call_id=cjfbdfydrjielti at X340saucy;code=408;reason=RequestTimeout;src_user=kelvin;src_domain=2X8.1X1.3X.2X;src_ip=1X5.2X2.1X7.1X0;dst_ouser=14X88X72X2X;dst_user=14X88X72X2X;dst_domain=100.200.30.40;callrate=0.007600000000
>>> <mailto:timestamp=1387019197;method=INVITE;from_tag=wyudf;to_tag=;call_id=cjfbdfydrjielti at X340saucy;code=408;reason=RequestTimeout;src_user=kelvin;src_domain=2X8.1X1.3X.2X;src_ip=1X5.2X2.1X7.1X0;dst_ouser=14X88X72X2X;dst_user=14X88X72X2X;dst_domain=100.200.30.40;callrate=0.007600000000>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kelvin Chua
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
>> mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20131218/b33ef4f4/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list