[SR-Users] ACC issue on 4.0 trunk when doing serial fork

[Kelvin Chua]

Yes, a local timeout. The call was sent to a bogus IP. i still feel this
behaviour is wrong. $rd in acc should contain the failed gateway's ip and
not the previous one.
On Dec 17, 2013 4:43 PM, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda at gmail.com>
wrote:

>  It is a local timeout, not a 408 received from callee, right?
>
> Daniel
>
> On 17/12/13 05:16, Kelvin Chua wrote:
>
> it's for a 408 timeout logged into missed_calls
>
> Kelvin Chua
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  Hello,
>>
>> is it for a 200ok reply or >=300?
>>
>> In the code, the r-uri from the branch that is used for relaying the
>> reply should be used.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 14/12/13 12:15, Kelvin Chua wrote:
>>
>>    this is the 2nd branch, the first branch is sent to 100.200.30.40
>> $rd is set properly according to xlog (10.20.30.40). tcpdump proves
>> packets are sent to 10.20.30.40
>> however, after failing, ACC logs dst_domain as the previous branch's $rd
>> (100.200.30.40), not the current one.
>> is this the expected behavior? seems incorrect.
>>
>>  modparam("acc",
>> "db_extra","src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;src_ip=$si;dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd;callrate=$avp(callrate)")
>>
>>  failure_route[SERIAL] {
>>         if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) {
>>                 t_on_branch("MANAGE_BRANCH");
>>                 t_on_reply("MANAGE_REPLY");
>>         }
>>         if ( isbflagset(FLB_CANCEL) ) {
>>                 xlog("cancel bflag set!\n");
>>                 exit;
>>         } else if ( !t_next_contacts() ) {
>>                  xlog("serial fork done!\n");
>>                 t_reply("404", "Not here or busy");
>>                 exit;
>>         } else {
>>                 setflag(FLT_ACC);
>>                 setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED);
>>                 xlog("failure_route new branch - $ru\n");
>>                 t_on_failure("SERIAL");
>>                 $avp(callrate) = "";
>>                 if ( $sel(ruri.params["rtmr"]) != $null ) {
>>
>> t_set_fr($sel(ruri.params["rtmr"])*1000,$sel(ruri.params["dtmr"])*1000);
>>                         $avp(ABSOLUTE) = $sel(ruri.params["tmr"]);
>>                 }
>>                 if ( $sel(ruri.params["callrate"]) != $null )
>>                         $avp(callrate) = $sel(ruri.params["callrate"]);
>>                 xlog("failure_route sending INVITE to $rd\n");
>>                 t_relay();
>>         }
>> }
>>
>>  ERROR: <script>: failure_route sending INVITE to 10.20.30.40
>> DEBUG: <script>: new branch [1] to
>> sip:14X88X72X2X at 10.20.30.40:5060;dtmr=1;rtmr=20;tmr=60;callrate=0.007600000000
>> DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: has_totag(): no totag
>> DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy_funcs.c:148]: check_content_type(): type
>> <application/sdp> found valid
>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c:565]: extract_mediaip():
>> located IP address [192.168.5.191] in `o=' field
>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c:565]: extract_mediaip():
>> located IP address [192.168.5.191] in `c=' field
>> DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy.c:2630]: force_rtp_proxy(): proxy reply: 10370
>> 2X8.1X1.3X.2X#012
>> DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: has_totag(): no totag
>> DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:461]: clen_builder(): clen_builder:
>> content-length: 172 (172)
>> DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:206]: check_via_address():
>> check_via_address(1X5.2X2.1X7.1X0, 192.168.5.191, 0)
>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:793]: free_sdp(): _sdp = 0x7f53c9a5e580
>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:795]: free_sdp(): sdp = 0x7f53cb87d3e0
>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:797]: free_sdp(): session = 0x7f53cb87d480
>> DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1710]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0,
>> save=0, relay=-1
>> DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1211]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>>
>> T_code=100, new_code=408
>> DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: run_trans_callbacks_internal(): DBG:
>> trans=0x7f53c1511148, callback type 128, id 0 entered
>> DEBUG: acc [acc_logic.c:539]: tmcb_func(): acc callback called for
>> t(0x7f53c1511148) event type 128, reply code 408
>> NOTICE: acc [acc.c:279]: acc_log_request(): ACC: call missed:
>> timestamp=1387019197;method=INVITE;from_tag=wyudf;to_tag=;call_id=cjfbdfydrjielti at X340saucy;code=408;reason=RequestTimeout;src_user=kelvin;src_domain=2X8.1X1.3X.2X;src_ip=1X5.2X2.1X7.1X0;dst_ouser=14X88X72X2X;dst_user=14X88X72X2X;dst_domain=100.200.30.40;callrate=0.007600000000
>>
>>
>> Kelvin Chua
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing listsr-users at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20131217/c1bb0110/attachment.html>