[SR-Users] ACC issue on 4.0 trunk when doing serial fork

Kelvin Chua kelchy at gmail.com
Thu Dec 19 01:55:02 CET 2013


Also noticed $ru pegged at the first branch's ruri upon entering
failure_route for succeeding branches. Is this also an expected behaviour?
Should it not contain the ruri of the previous failed branch?
On Dec 18, 2013 4:19 PM, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda at gmail.com>
wrote:

>  Hello,
>
> I will look over it -- I wanted to know exactly the situation.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 17/12/13 15:54, Kelvin Chua wrote:
>
> Yes, a local timeout. The call was sent to a bogus IP. i still feel this
> behaviour is wrong. $rd in acc should contain the failed gateway's ip and
> not the previous one.
> On Dec 17, 2013 4:43 PM, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>  It is a local timeout, not a 408 received from callee, right?
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 17/12/13 05:16, Kelvin Chua wrote:
>>
>> it's for a 408 timeout logged into missed_calls
>>
>> Kelvin Chua
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>> miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hello,
>>>
>>> is it for a 200ok reply or >=300?
>>>
>>> In the code, the r-uri from the branch that is used for relaying the
>>> reply should be used.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14/12/13 12:15, Kelvin Chua wrote:
>>>
>>>    this is the 2nd branch, the first branch is sent to 100.200.30.40
>>> $rd is set properly according to xlog (10.20.30.40). tcpdump proves
>>> packets are sent to 10.20.30.40
>>> however, after failing, ACC logs dst_domain as the previous branch's $rd
>>> (100.200.30.40), not the current one.
>>> is this the expected behavior? seems incorrect.
>>>
>>>  modparam("acc",
>>> "db_extra","src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;src_ip=$si;dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd;callrate=$avp(callrate)")
>>>
>>>  failure_route[SERIAL] {
>>>         if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) {
>>>                 t_on_branch("MANAGE_BRANCH");
>>>                 t_on_reply("MANAGE_REPLY");
>>>         }
>>>         if ( isbflagset(FLB_CANCEL) ) {
>>>                 xlog("cancel bflag set!\n");
>>>                 exit;
>>>         } else if ( !t_next_contacts() ) {
>>>                  xlog("serial fork done!\n");
>>>                 t_reply("404", "Not here or busy");
>>>                 exit;
>>>         } else {
>>>                 setflag(FLT_ACC);
>>>                 setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED);
>>>                 xlog("failure_route new branch - $ru\n");
>>>                 t_on_failure("SERIAL");
>>>                 $avp(callrate) = "";
>>>                 if ( $sel(ruri.params["rtmr"]) != $null ) {
>>>
>>> t_set_fr($sel(ruri.params["rtmr"])*1000,$sel(ruri.params["dtmr"])*1000);
>>>                         $avp(ABSOLUTE) = $sel(ruri.params["tmr"]);
>>>                 }
>>>                 if ( $sel(ruri.params["callrate"]) != $null )
>>>                         $avp(callrate) = $sel(ruri.params["callrate"]);
>>>                 xlog("failure_route sending INVITE to $rd\n");
>>>                 t_relay();
>>>         }
>>> }
>>>
>>>  ERROR: <script>: failure_route sending INVITE to 10.20.30.40
>>> DEBUG: <script>: new branch [1] to
>>> sip:14X88X72X2X at 10.20.30.40:5060;dtmr=1;rtmr=20;tmr=60;callrate=0.007600000000
>>> DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: has_totag(): no totag
>>> DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy_funcs.c:148]: check_content_type(): type
>>> <application/sdp> found valid
>>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c:565]: extract_mediaip():
>>> located IP address [192.168.5.191] in `o=' field
>>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c:565]: extract_mediaip():
>>> located IP address [192.168.5.191] in `c=' field
>>> DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy.c:2630]: force_rtp_proxy(): proxy reply: 10370
>>> 2X8.1X1.3X.2X#012
>>> DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: has_totag(): no totag
>>> DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:461]: clen_builder(): clen_builder:
>>> content-length: 172 (172)
>>> DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:206]: check_via_address():
>>> check_via_address(1X5.2X2.1X7.1X0, 192.168.5.191, 0)
>>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:793]: free_sdp(): _sdp = 0x7f53c9a5e580
>>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:795]: free_sdp(): sdp = 0x7f53cb87d3e0
>>> DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:797]: free_sdp(): session =
>>> 0x7f53cb87d480
>>> DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1710]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0,
>>> save=0, relay=-1
>>> DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1211]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>>
>>> T_code=100, new_code=408
>>> DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: run_trans_callbacks_internal(): DBG:
>>> trans=0x7f53c1511148, callback type 128, id 0 entered
>>> DEBUG: acc [acc_logic.c:539]: tmcb_func(): acc callback called for
>>> t(0x7f53c1511148) event type 128, reply code 408
>>> NOTICE: acc [acc.c:279]: acc_log_request(): ACC: call missed:
>>> timestamp=1387019197;method=INVITE;from_tag=wyudf;to_tag=;call_id=cjfbdfydrjielti at X340saucy;code=408;reason=RequestTimeout;src_user=kelvin;src_domain=2X8.1X1.3X.2X;src_ip=1X5.2X2.1X7.1X0;dst_ouser=14X88X72X2X;dst_user=14X88X72X2X;dst_domain=100.200.30.40;callrate=0.007600000000
>>>
>>>
>>> Kelvin Chua
>>>
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing listsr-users at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20131219/f3fa2bf5/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list